Determining the relativistic parameter γ using very long baseline interferometry
A&A, 499 1 (2009) 331-335
Published online: 2009-04-01
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Роль обобщенной комптоновской длины волны в эффектах общей теории относительности
Davide FiscalettiТеоретическая и математическая физика 222 (2) 390 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf10772
Gravitational lensing of neutrinos in parametrized black hole spacetimes
Mirzabek Alloqulov, Hrishikesh Chakrabarty, Daniele Malafarina, Bobomurat Ahmedov and Ahmadjon AbdujabbarovJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (02) 070 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/070
Implications of generalized Compton wavelength in the effects of general relativity
D. FiscalettiTheoretical and Mathematical Physics 222 (2) 332 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577925020096
Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity
Fernando M. Belchior, Roberto V. Maluf, Albert Yu. Petrov and Paulo J. PorfírioThe European Physical Journal C 85 (6) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14390-9
Post-newtonian tests of gravitational quantum field theory with spin and scaling gauge symmetry
Ying-Jian Chen, Peng Xu and Yue-Liang WuThe European Physical Journal C 85 (3) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13993-6
Solar System tests in covariant f(Q) gravity
Wenyi Wang, Kun Hu and Taishi KatsuragawaPhysical Review D 111 (6) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.064038
Gravitational observations and LQGUP
Mohammed Hemeda, Hassan Alshal, Ahmed Farag Ali and Elias C. VagenasNuclear Physics B 1000 116456 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116456
Assessment of the experimental support for differential simultaneity
Edward T. KipreosInternational Journal of Modern Physics A 39 (32) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X24501380
Linear dynamics and classical tests of the gravitational quantum field theory
Yuan-Kun Gao, Da Huang, Yong-Liang Ma, Yong Tang, Yue-Liang Wu and Yu-Feng ZhouPhysical Review D 109 (6) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064072
The corrections to the metric of Reissner-Nordström black hole from the generalized uncertainty principle
A S Sefiedgar and H Jabbari FiroozjahPhysica Scripta 99 (9) 095019 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad6d0a
Consistent constraints on the equivalence principle from localized fast radio bursts
Robert Reischke and Steffen HagstotzMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 523 (4) 6264 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1866
Multi-scalar theories of gravity with direct matter couplings and their parametrized post-Newtonian parameters
Osmin Lacombe and Shinji MukohyamaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (08) 054 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/08/054
Finite-distance gravitational deflection of massive particles by a rotating black hole in loop quantum gravity
Yang Huang and Zhoujian CaoThe European Physical Journal C 83 (1) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11180-z
Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity
A. A. Araújo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov and P. J. PorfírioPhysical Review D 108 (8) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.085010
Gravitational distortion on photon state at the vicinity of the Earth
Qasem Exirifard and Ebrahim KarimiPhysical Review D 105 (8) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084016
Light Deflection under the Gravitational Field of Jupiter—Testing General Relativity
Yingjie Li, Ye Xu, JingJing Li, Yuanwei Wu, Shaibo Bian, ZeHao Lin, WenJin Yang, Chaojie Hao and DeJian LiuThe Astrophysical Journal 925 (1) 47 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3821
A new class of solutions that are curved in 4D but flat in 5D
James Overduin, Jonathan Perry and Azriel WeinrebGeneral Relativity and Gravitation 54 (1) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02892-2
Fermat’s principle and the effect of jerk on light motion near the Sun
Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi and Waranont AnukoolModern Physics Letters A 36 (40) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732321502771
Testing fundamental physics with astrophysical transients
Jun-Jie Wei and Xue-Feng WuFrontiers of Physics 16 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-021-1049-x
Probing Gravitational Waves from Pulsars in Brans–Dicke Theory
Paritosh VermaUniverse 7 (7) 235 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7070235
Constraints on equivalence principle violation from gamma ray bursts
D. J. Bartlett, D. Bergsdal, H. Desmond, P. G. Ferreira and J. JaschePhysical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084025
On fractional and fractal Einstein’s field equations
Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi and Alireza Khalili GolmankhanehModern Physics Letters A 36 (05) 2150030 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732321500309
Relativistic Geodesy
Aurélien Hees, Adrien Bourgoin, Pacome Delva, Christophe Le Poncin-Lafitte and Peter WolfFundamental Theories of Physics, Relativistic Geodesy 196 317 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_9
Finite distance corrections to the light deflection in a gravitational field with a plasma medium
Gabriel Crisnejo, Emanuel Gallo and Adam RogersPhysical Review D 99 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124001
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Clifford M. WillTheory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316338612
Testing general relativity with geodetic VLBI
O. Titov, A. Girdiuk, S. B. Lambert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 618 A8 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833459
International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World
Oleg Titov and Hana KrásnáInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia, International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World 149 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_48
Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model
R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis and E. B. SantosPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104001
Post-Newtonian parameter γ and the deflection of light in ghost-free massive bimetric gravity
Manuel HohmannPhysical Review D 95 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124049
Graviton mass bounds from an analysis of bright star trajectories at the Galactic Center
Alexander Zakharov, Predrag Jovanović, Dusko Borka, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 138 01010 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201713801010
Prospects of Dynamical Determination of General Relativity Parameter β and Solar Quadrupole Moment with Asteroid Radar Astronomy
Ashok K. Verma, Jean-Luc Margot and Adam H. GreenbergThe Astrophysical Journal 845 (2) 166 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8308
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Patrick Petitjean, F. Y. Wang, X. F. Wu and J. J. WeiSpace Sciences Series of ISSI, Gamma-Ray Bursts 61 197 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1279-6_9
Test of the Equivalence Principle in the Dark sector on galactic scales
N. Mohapi, A. Hees and J. LarenaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (03) 032 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/032
Testing Einstein’s weak equivalence principle with a 0.4-nanosecond giant pulse of the Crab pulsar
Yuan-Pei Yang and Bing ZhangPhysical Review D 94 (10) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.101501
TESTS OF THE EINSTEIN EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE USING TeV BLAZARS
Jun-Jie Wei, Jie-Shuang Wang, He Gao and Xue-Feng WuThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 818 (1) L2 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L2
Probing the post-newtonian physics of semi-conservative metric theories through secular tidal effects in satellite gradiometry missions
Li-E Qiang and Peng XuInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 25 (06) 1650070 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827181650070X
Testing Einstein's Equivalence Principle with multi-band Very Long Baseline Array measurements of AGN core shifts
Bo Zhang, Jun-Jie Wei, He Gao and Xue-Feng WuJournal of High Energy Astrophysics 9-10 39 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2016.04.002
Testing Einstein's equivalence principle with short gamma-ray bursts: Table 1.
Yu Sang, Hai-Nan Lin and Zhe ChangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (2) 2282 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1136
Testing Einstein's Equivalence Principle with supercluster Laniakea's gravitational field
Zhi-Xing Luo, Bo Zhang, Jun-Jie Wei and Xue-Feng WuJournal of High Energy Astrophysics 9-10 35 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2016.04.001
Lorentz symmetry and very long baseline interferometry
C. Le Poncin-Lafitte, A. Hees and S. LambertPhysical Review D 94 (12) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.125030
GRBs and Fundamental Physics
Patrick Petitjean, F. Y. Wang, X. F. Wu and J. J. WeiSpace Science Reviews 202 (1-4) 195 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0235-6
Tests of Lorentz Symmetry in the Gravitational Sector
Aurélien Hees, Quentin Bailey, Adrien Bourgoin, Hélène Pihan-Le Bars, Christine Guerlin and Christophe Le Poncin-LafitteUniverse 2 (4) 30 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe2040030
Numerical estimation of the sensitivity of INPOP planetary ephemerides to general relativity parameters
A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Exertier, H. Manche and M. GastineauCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 123 (3) 325 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9639-y
Gravitational correction to vacuum polarization
U. D. JentschuraPhysical Review A 91 (2) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022112
Randers geometry as MOND/dark matter
Qasem ExirifardJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (11) 026 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/026
COSMIC TRANSIENTS TEST EINSTEIN’S EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE OUT TO GeV ENERGIES
He Gao, Xue-Feng Wu and Peter MészárosThe Astrophysical Journal 810 (2) 121 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/121
Gravitational tests of the generalized uncertainty principle
Fabio Scardigli and Roberto CasadioThe European Physical Journal C 75 (9) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3635-y
The 1919 measurement of the deflection of light
Clifford M WillClassical and Quantum Gravity 32 (12) 124001 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/12/124001
Testing Lorentz symmetry with planetary orbital dynamics
A. Hees, Q. G. Bailey, C. Le Poncin-Lafitte, et al.Physical Review D 92 (6) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.064049
Test of the gravitational redshift with stable clocks in eccentric orbits: application to Galileo satellites 5 and 6
P Delva, A Hees, S Bertone, E Richard and P WolfClassical and Quantum Gravity 32 (23) 232003 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/23/232003
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Clifford M. WillLiving Reviews in Relativity 17 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-4
Microarcsecond Radio Astrometry
M.J. Reid and M. HonmaAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 (1) 339 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040006
Time transfer functions as a way to validate light propagation solutions for space astrometry
Stefano Bertone, Olivier Minazzoli, Mariateresa Crosta, et al.Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (1) 015021 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/1/015021
Sciences of Geodesy - II
Harald Schuh and Johannes BöhmSciences of Geodesy - II 339 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_7
Sciences of Geodesy - II
Ludwig CombrinckSciences of Geodesy - II 53 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_2
VLBI: A fascinating technique for geodesy and astrometry
H. Schuh and D. BehrendJournal of Geodynamics 61 68 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2012.07.007
Antimatter, the SME, and gravity
Jay D. TassonHyperfine Interactions 213 (1-3) 137 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-012-0642-3
LEAP 2011
Jay D. TassonLEAP 2011 357 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5530-7_38
Matter-gravity couplings and Lorentz violation
V. Alan Kostelecký and Jay D. TassonPhysical Review D 83 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.016013
The INPOP10a planetary ephemeris and its applications in fundamental physics
A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Kuchynka, et al.Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 111 (3) 363 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9377-8
Mars high resolution gravity fields from MRO, Mars seasonal gravity, and other dynamical parameters
Alex S. Konopliv, Sami W. Asmar, William M. Folkner, Özgür Karatekin, Daniel C. Nunes, Suzanne E. Smrekar, Charles F. Yoder and Maria T. ZuberIcarus 211 (1) 401 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010.10.004
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527634569.ch3
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527634569.ch7
Improved determination ofγby VLBI
S. B. Lambert and C. Le Poncin-LafitteAstronomy & Astrophysics 529 A70 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016370
Upper bounds on the photon mass
Antonio Accioly, José Helayël-Neto and Eslley ScatenaPhysical Review D 82 (6) (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.065026
Combining general relativity, massive QED and Very Long Baseline Interferometry to gravitationally constrain the photon mass
Antonio Accioly, José Helayël-Neto and Eslley ScatenaPhysics Letters A 374 (37) 3806 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2010.07.050
Gravitational and quantum bounds on the photon mass
Antonio Accioly, José Helayël-Neto, Rodrigo Turcati, Jefferson Morais and Eslley ScatenaClassical and Quantum Gravity 27 (20) 205010 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/205010
PHOTON MASS AND VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY
ANTONIO ACCIOLY, JOSÉ HELAYËL-NETO and ESLLEY SCATENAInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 19 (14) 2393 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827181001844X
Very long baseline interferometry: accuracy limits and relativistic tests
Robert Heinkelmann and Harald SchuhProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S261) 286 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921309990524
Gravity tests with INPOP planetary ephemerides
A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Kuchynka, et al.Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S261) 159 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921309990330