Photometric redshifts for the CFHTLS T0004 deep and wide fields
A&A, 500 3 (2009) 981-998
Published online: 2009-04-29
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
DAG Teleskobu için Üretilen Simülasyon Görüntüleriyle Fotometrik Kırmızıya Kaymaların Belirlenmesi
Süleyman Fişek and Sinan AlişTurkish Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 6 (1) 1 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.55064/tjaa.1613991
Field-level simulation-based inference with galaxy catalogs: the impact of systematic effects
Natalí S.M. de Santi, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, L. Raul Abramo, Helen Shao, Lucia A. Perez, Tiago Castro, Yueying Ni, Christopher C. Lovell, Elena Hernández-Martínez, Federico Marinacci, David N. Spergel, Klaus Dolag, Lars Hernquist and Mark VogelsbergerJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (01) 082 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/082
Fossil groups analysis using weak gravitational lensing
M Castejon, E S Cypriano and A Z VitorelliMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 534 (1) 852 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2078
XMM-SERVS X-ray extended Galaxy Cluster (XVXGC) catalog
Weiwei Xu, Linhua Jiang, Ran Li, Bin Luo, William Nielsen Brandt, Chaoli Zhang and Thomas ErbenAstronomy & Astrophysics 691 A300 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451064
Euclid preparation
S. Paltani, J. Coupon, W. G. Hartley, A. Alvarez-Ayllon, F. Dubath, J. J. Mohr, M. Schirmer, J.-C. Cuillandre, G. Desprez, O. Ilbert, K. Kuijken, N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, A. Amara, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, R. Bender, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 681 A66 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346993
Accuracy of the Photometric Redshifts of Brightest Cluster Galaxies Identified in the CFHTLS-W1
Sinan AlişJournal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences 10 (4) 954 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.1562591
X-ray spectral properties of dust-obscured galaxies in the XMM-SERVS coverage of the XMM-LSS field
Abhijit Kayal and Veeresh SinghMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531 (1) 830 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1191
Imputation of missing photometric data and photometric redshift estimation for CSST
Zhijian Luo, Zhirui Tang, Zhu Chen, Liping Fu, Wei Du, Shaohua Zhang, Yan Gong, Chenggang Shu, Junhao Lu, Yicheng Li, Xian-Min Meng, Xingchen Zhou and Zuhui FanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531 (3) 3539 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1397
The PAU Survey and Euclid: Improving broadband photometric redshifts with multi-task learning
L. Cabayol, M. Eriksen, J. Carretero, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 671 A153 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245027
Estimating photometric redshift from mock flux for CSST survey by using weighted Random Forest
Junhao Lu, Zhijian Luo, Zhu Chen, Liping Fu, Wei Du, Yan Gong, Yicheng Li, Xian-Min Meng, Zhirui Tang, Shaohua Zhang, Chenggang Shu, Xingchen Zhou and Zuhui FanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (4) 12140 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3976
Galaksi Kümelerindeki Kırmızı-Kol Galaksilerinin Evrimi
Eyüp Kaan ÜLGEN, Sinan ALİŞ, Oğuzhan ÇAKIR, Fuat Korhan YELKENCİ and Süleyman FİŞEKTurkish Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 4 (3) 208 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.55064/tjaa.1203864
Structural analysis of brightest cluster galaxies in poor and rich clusters
Eman Shaaban, Sinan Alis, Mehmet Bektasoglu, F. Korhan Yelkenci, E. Kaan Ulgen, Oguzhan Cakir and Suleyman FisekNew Astronomy 100 101998 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2022.101998
Identification and properties of isolated field elliptical galaxies from CFHTLS-W1
E. Kaan Ulgen, Sinan Alis, Christophe Benoist, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 39 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2022.28
The PAU survey: measurements of the 4000 Å spectral break with narrow-band photometry
Pablo Renard, Malgorzata Siudek, Martin B Eriksen, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (1) 146 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1730
COSMOS2020: A Panchromatic View of the Universe to z ∼ 10 from Two Complementary Catalogs
J. R. Weaver, O. B. Kauffmann, O. Ilbert, H. J. McCracken, A. Moneti, S. Toft, G. Brammer, M. Shuntov, I. Davidzon, B. C. Hsieh, C. Laigle, A. Anastasiou, C. K. Jespersen, J. Vinther, P. Capak, C. M. Casey, C. J. R. McPartland, B. Milvang-Jensen, B. Mobasher, D. B. Sanders, L. Zalesky, S. Arnouts, H. Aussel, J. S. Dunlop, A. Faisst, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 258 (1) 11 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078
Optically detected galaxy cluster candidates in the AKARI North Ecliptic Pole field based on photometric redshift from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam
Ting-Chi Huang, Hideo Matsuhara, Tomotsugu Goto, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (4) 6063 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2128
Photometric redshift estimation with a convolutional neural network: NetZ
S. Schuldt, S. H. Suyu, R. Cañameras, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 651 A55 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039945
The Hobby–Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) Survey Design, Reductions, and Detections*
Karl Gebhardt, Erin Mentuch Cooper, Robin Ciardullo, Viviana Acquaviva, Ralf Bender, William P. Bowman, Barbara G. Castanheira, Gavin Dalton, Dustin Davis, Roelof S. de Jong, D. L. DePoy, Yaswant Devarakonda, Sun Dongsheng, Niv Drory, Maximilian Fabricius, Daniel J. Farrow, John Feldmeier, Steven L. Finkelstein, Cynthia S. Froning, Eric Gawiser, Caryl Gronwall, Laura Herold, Gary J. Hill, Ulrich Hopp, Lindsay R. House, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 923 (2) 217 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03
Protocluster detection in simulations of HSC–SSP and the 10-yr LSST forecast, using PCcones
Pablo Araya-Araya, Marcelo C Vicentin, Laerte Sodré, Roderik A Overzier and Hector CuevasMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5054 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1133
CCCP and MENeaCS: (updated) weak-lensing masses for 100 galaxy clusters
Ricardo Herbonnet, Cristóbal Sifón, Henk Hoekstra, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (4) 4684 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2303
Measurement of the B-band galaxy Luminosity Function with Approximate Bayesian Computation
Luca Tortorelli, Martina Fagioli, Jörg Herbel, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (09) 048 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/048
Candidate fossil groups in the CFHTLS: a probabilistic approach
C. Adami, F. Sarron, N. Martinet and F. DurretAstronomy & Astrophysics 639 A97 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936289
The OTELO survey
Jakub Nadolny, Maritza A. Lara-López, Miguel Cerviño, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A84 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936205
Characterising filaments in the SDSS volume from the galaxy distribution
Nicola Malavasi, Nabila Aghanim, Marian Douspis, Hideki Tanimura and Victor BonjeanAstronomy & Astrophysics 642 A19 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037647
The XXL Survey
M. Ricci, R. Adam, D. Eckert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 642 A126 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937249
A SHARP view of H0LiCOW: H0 from three time-delay gravitational lens systems with adaptive optics imaging
Geoff C-F Chen, Christopher D Fassnacht, Sherry H Suyu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) 1743 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2547
Weak lensing measurements of the APEX-SZ galaxy cluster sample
Kaustuv Basu, Martin Sommer, Adrian T Lee, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 1704 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1491
Pre-processing of galaxies in cosmic filaments around AMASCFI clusters in the CFHTLS
F. Sarron, C. Adami, F. Durret and C. LaigleAstronomy & Astrophysics 632 A49 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935394
Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses for Galaxies from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
Hu Zou, Jinghua Gao, Xu Zhou and Xu KongThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 242 (1) 8 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab1847
Stellar mass–halo mass relation for the brightest central galaxies of X-ray clusters since z ∼ 0.65
G. Erfanianfar, A. Finoguenov, K. Furnell, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A175 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935375
The OTELO survey
Ángel Bongiovanni, Marina Ramón-Pérez, Ana María Pérez García, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A9 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833294
Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect and X-ray scaling relations from weak lensing mass calibration of 32 South Pole Telescope selected galaxy clusters
J P Dietrich, S Bocquet, T Schrabback, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (3) 2871 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3088
Compact Galaxies at intermediate redshifts quench faster than normal-sized Galaxies
J P Nogueira-Cavalcante, T S Gonçalves, K Menéndez-Delmestre, I G de la Rosa and A CharbonnierMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (3) 3022 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz190
The bright-star masks for the HSC-SSP survey
Jean Coupon, Nicole Czakon, James Bosch, Yutaka Komiyama, Elinor Medezinski, Satoshi Miyazaki and Masamune OguriPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 (SP1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx047
Evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function in the CFHTLS: breaking the degeneracy between mass and redshift
F. Sarron, N. Martinet, F. Durret and C. AdamiAstronomy & Astrophysics 613 A67 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731981
Deep learning approach for classifying, detecting and predicting photometric redshifts of quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey stripe 82
J. Pasquet-Itam and J. PasquetAstronomy & Astrophysics 611 A97 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731106
The XXL Survey
E. Koulouridis, M. Ricci, P. Giles, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 620 A20 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832974
The many flavours of photometric redshifts
Mara Salvato, Olivier Ilbert and Ben HoyleNature Astronomy 3 (3) 212 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0478-0
A sample of 1959 massive galaxy clusters at high redshifts
Z L Wen and J L HanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) 4158 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2533
The Faintest and Closest Clusters in CFHTLS W4
Mukadder İĞDİ-ŞENBilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 2 53 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.487078
A Photometric Redshift Catalog Based on SCUSS, SDSS, and WISE Surveys
Jinghua Gao, Hu Zou, Xu Zhou and Xu KongThe Astrophysical Journal 862 (1) 12 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacbc6
Photometric redshifts for Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Data Release 1
Masayuki Tanaka, Jean Coupon, Bau-Ching Hsieh, Sogo Mineo, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Joshua Speagle, Hisanori Furusawa, Satoshi Miyazaki and Hitoshi MurayamaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 (SP1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx077
A Gemini view of the galaxy cluster RXC J1504-0248: insights on the nature of the central gaseous filaments
A C Soja, L Sodré, R Monteiro-Oliveira, E S Cypriano and G B Lima NetoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (3) 3279 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty638
Analysis of candidates for interacting galaxy clusters
Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez, Martín de los Rios, Gabriel A. Oio, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 611 A78 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732003
The XXL Survey
M. Ricci, C. Benoist, S. Maurogordato, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 620 A13 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832989
11 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2309520
Models of gravitational lens candidates from Space Warps CFHTLS
Rafael Küng, Prasenjit Saha, Ignacio Ferreras, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (3) 3700 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3012
Weak lensing and spectroscopic analysis of the nearby dissociative merging galaxy cluster Abell 3376
R. Monteiro-Oliveira, G. B. Lima Neto, E. S. Cypriano, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 468 (4) 4566 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx791
Weak-lensing measurement of the mass–richness relation using the SDSS data base
Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez, Facundo Rodriguez, Diego García Lambas, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1348 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2803
The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: final emission line galaxy target selection
A. Raichoor, J. Comparat, T. Delubac, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (4) 3955 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1790
An Optically Faint Quasar Survey at z ∼ 5 in the CFHTLS Wide Field: Estimates of the Black Hole Masses and Eddington Ratios
H. Ikeda, T. Nagao, K. Matsuoka, N. Kawakatu, M. Kajisawa, M. Akiyama, T. Miyaji and T. MorokumaThe Astrophysical Journal 846 (1) 57 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa83ae
Photometric calibration of the COMBO-17 survey with the Softassign Procrustes Matching method
Z. Sheikhbahaee, R. Nakajima, T. Erben, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (3) 3443 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1810
Photometric redshifts and clustering of emission line galaxies selected jointly by DES and eBOSS
S. Jouvel, T. Delubac, J. Comparat, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (3) 2771 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx163
DEEP CFHT Y-BAND IMAGING OF VVDS-F22 FIELD. I. DATA PRODUCTS AND PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS
Dezi Liu, Jinyi Yang, Shuo Yuan, Xue-Bing Wu, Zuhui Fan, Huanyuan Shan, Haojing Yan and Xianzhong ZhengThe Astronomical Journal 153 (2) 53 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/53
The VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey: Lyαemission and stellar populations of star-forming galaxies at 2 < z < 2.5
N. P. Hathi, O. Le Fèvre, O. Ilbert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 588 A26 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526012
ICL light in a z~0.5 cluster: the MUSE perspective
E. Pompei and C. AdamiProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 11 (S321) 336 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921316011297
The XXL Survey
E. Koulouridis, B. Poggianti, B. Altieri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A11 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526976
Detection of enhancement in number densities of background galaxies due to magnification by massive galaxy clusters
I. Chiu, J. P. Dietrich, J. Mohr, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (3) 3050 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw190
THE NEXT GENERATION VIRGO CLUSTER SURVEY (NGVS). XXV. FIDUCIAL PANCHROMATIC COLORS OF VIRGO CORE GLOBULAR CLUSTERS AND THEIR COMPARISON TO MODEL PREDICTIONS
Mathieu Powalka, Ariane Lançon, Thomas H. Puzia, Eric W. Peng, Chengze Liu, Roberto P. Muñoz, John P. Blakeslee, Patrick Côté, Laura Ferrarese, Joel Roediger, Rúben Sánchez-Janssen, Hongxin Zhang, Patrick R. Durrell, Jean-Charles Cuillandre, Pierre-Alain Duc, Puragra Guhathakurta, S. D. J. Gwyn, Patrick Hudelot, Simona Mei and Elisa TolobaThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 227 (1) 12 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/12
The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: selecting emission line galaxies using the Fisher discriminant
A. Raichoor, J. Comparat, T. Delubac, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 585 A50 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526486
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
M. Crocce, J. Carretero, A. H. Bauer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (4) 4301 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2590
The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions at z ∼ 1.4
Teppei Okumura, Chiaki Hikage, Tomonori Totani, Motonari Tonegawa, Hiroyuki Okada, Karl Glazebrook, Chris Blake, Pedro G. Ferreira, Surhud More, Atsushi Taruya, Shinji Tsujikawa, Masayuki Akiyama, Gavin Dalton, Tomotsugu Goto, Takashi Ishikawa, Fumihide Iwamuro, Takahiko Matsubara, Takahiro Nishimichi, Kouji Ohta, Ikkoh Shimizu, Ryuichi Takahashi, Naruhisa Takato, Naoyuki Tamura, Kiyoto Yabe and Naoki YoshidaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 68 (3) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psw029
Space Warps– II. New gravitational lens candidates from the CFHTLS discovered through citizen science
Anupreeta More, Aprajita Verma, Philip J. Marshall, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (2) 1191 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1965
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
I. Davidzon, O. Cucciati, M. Bolzonella, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 586 A23 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527129
The XXL Survey
C. Adami, E. Pompei, T. Sadibekova, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A7 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526831
The XXL Survey
F. Ziparo, G. P. Smith, S. L. Mulroy, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A9 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526792
The PCA Lens-Finder: application to CFHTLS
D. Paraficz, F. Courbin, A. Tramacere, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A75 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527971
An accurate cluster selection function for the J-PAS narrow-band wide-field survey
B. Ascaso, N. Benítez, R. Dupke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4291 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2988
The XXL survey XV: evidence for dry merger driven BCG growth in XXL-100-GC X-ray clusters
S. Lavoie, J. P. Willis, J. Démoclès, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (4) 4141 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1906
Clustering properties ofg-selected galaxies atz∼ 0.8
Ginevra Favole, Johan Comparat, Francisco Prada, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (4) 3421 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1483
The evolution of the [O ii], H β and [O iii] emission line luminosity functions over the last nine billions years
Johan Comparat, Guangtun Zhu, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (1) 1076 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1393
The XXL Survey
N. Baran, V. Smolčić, D. Milaković, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A8 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526952
Low X-ray luminosity galaxy clusters – III. Weak lensing mass determination at 0.18
Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez, Gael Foëx, José Luis Nilo Castellón, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (3) 2225 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv787
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (3) 2225 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv787
The 0.1
Johan Comparat, Johan Richard, Jean-Paul Kneib, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 A40 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424767
Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 A40 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424767
Probing the galaxy–halo connection in UltraVISTA to z ∼ 2
H. J. McCracken, M. Wolk, S. Colombi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) 901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv305
The evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function betweenz= 0.4 and 0.9 in the DAFT/FADA survey
Nicolas Martinet, Florence Durret, Loïc Guennou, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 A116 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423796
The matter distribution inz~ 0.5 redshift clusters of galaxies
G. Soucail, G. Foëx, E. Pointecouteau, M. Arnaud and M. LimousinAstronomy & Astrophysics 581 A31 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322689
PRIMUS: THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL SCALE ON THE LUMINOSITY DEPENDENCE OF GALAXY CLUSTERING VIA CROSS-CORRELATIONS
Aaron D. Bray, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Ramin A. Skibba, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 811 (2) 90 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/90
BRIGHTEST X-RAY CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES IN THE CFHTLS WIDE FIELDS: CATALOG AND OPTICAL MASS ESTIMATOR
M. Mirkazemi, A. Finoguenov, M. J. Pereira, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 799 (1) 60 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/60
Two spectroscopically confirmed galaxy structures atz= 0.61 and 0.74 in the CFHTLS Deep 3 field
C. Adami, E. S. Cypriano, F. Durret, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 575 A69 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425159
The galaxy–halo connection from a joint lensing, clustering and abundance analysis in the CFHTLenS/VIPERS field
J. Coupon, S. Arnouts, L. van Waerbeke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 1352 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv276
Structure and dynamics of the supercluster of galaxies SC0028-0005
Ana Laura O'Mill, Dominique Proust, Hugo V. Capelato, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (1) 868 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1650
THE ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH DATA RELEASES OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FINAL DATA FROM SDSS-III
Shadab Alam, Franco D. Albareti, Carlos Allende Prieto, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 219 (1) 12 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12
Optical – near-infrared catalog for the AKARI north ecliptic pole Deep field
Nagisa Oi, Hideo Matsuhara, Kazumi Murata, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 566 A60 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322561
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
O. Cucciati, B. R. Granett, E. Branchini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 565 A67 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423409
SARCS strong-lensing galaxy groups
G. Foëx, V. Motta, E. Jullo, M. Limousin and T. VerdugoAstronomy & Astrophysics 572 A19 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424706
On fast generation of cosmological random fields
J. Carron, M. Wolk and I. SzapudiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (1) 994 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1527
Characterizing SL2S galaxy groups using the Einstein radius
T. Verdugo, V. Motta, G. Foëx, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 571 A65 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423696
RINGFINDER: AUTOMATED DETECTION OF GALAXY-SCALE GRAVITATIONAL LENSES IN GROUND-BASED MULTI-FILTER IMAGING DATA
Raphaël Gavazzi, Philip J. Marshall, Tommaso Treu and Alessandro SonnenfeldThe Astrophysical Journal 785 (2) 144 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/144
Colour matters: the effects of lensing on the positional offsets between optical and submillimetre galaxies in Herschel★-ATLAS
N. Bourne, S. J. Maddox, L. Dunne, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (2) 1884 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1582
A study of selection methods for Hα-emitting galaxies at z ∼ 1.3 for the Subaru/FMOS galaxy redshift survey for cosmology (FastSound)
Motonari Tonegawa, Tomonori Totani, Masayuki Akiyama, Gavin Dalton, Karl Glazebrook, Fumihide Iwamuro, Masanao Sumiyoshi, Naoyuki Tamura, Kiyoto Yabe, Jean Coupon, Tomotsugu Goto and Lee R. SpitlerPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 66 (2) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psu022
A new method to improve photometric redshift reconstruction
Alexia Gorecki, Alexandra Abate, Réza Ansari, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 561 A128 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321102
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Survey (VIPERS)
B. Garilli, L. Guzzo, M. Scodeggio, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 562 A23 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322790
X-ray AGN in the XMM-LSS galaxy clusters: no evidence of AGN suppression
E. Koulouridis, M. Plionis, O. Melnyk, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 567 A83 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423601
Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
C. Sánchez, M. Carrasco Kind, H. Lin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 445 (2) 1482 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1836
THE NEXT GENERATION VIRGO CLUSTER SURVEY. XV. THE PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT ESTIMATION FOR BACKGROUND SOURCES
A. Raichoor, S. Mei, T. Erben, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 797 (2) 102 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/102
THE PAN-STARRS1 MEDIUM-DEEP SURVEY: THE ROLE OF GALAXY GROUP ENVIRONMENT IN THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION AND QUIESCENT FRACTION OUT TOz∼ 0.8
Lihwai Lin, Hung-Yu Jian, Sebastien Foucaud, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 782 (1) 33 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/33
A NEW METHOD TO SEARCH FOR HIGH-REDSHIFT CLUSTERS USING PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS
G. Castignani, M. Chiaberge, A. Celotti and C. NormanThe Astrophysical Journal 792 (2) 113 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/113
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS):
A. Fritz, M. Scodeggio, O. Ilbert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 563 A92 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322379
Large-scale clustering measurements with photometric redshifts: comparing the dark matter haloes of X-ray AGN, star-forming and passive galaxies at z ≈ 1
A. Georgakakis, G. Mountrichas, M. Salvato, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (4) 3327 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1326