EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 694 (February 2025) A&A, 694 (2025) A98 References
Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 694, February 2025
Article Number A98
Number of page(s) 9
Section Numerical methods and codes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452492
Published online 06 February 2025
  1. Arras, P., Reinecke, M., Westermann, R., & Enßlin, T. A. 2021, A&A, 646, A58 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Astropy Collaboration (Robitaille, T. P., et al.) 2013, A&A, 558, A33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Astropy Collaboration (Price-Whelan, A. M., et al.) 2018, AJ, 156, 123 [Google Scholar]
  4. Astropy Collaboration (Price-Whelan, A. M., et al.) 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atemkeng, M., Perkins, S., Kenyon, J. S., Hugo, B. V., & Smirnov, O. 2022, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 532, eds. J. E. Ruiz, F. Pierfedereci, & P. Teuben, 71 [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, P. N., Kondapally, R., Williams, W. L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1729 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bondi, M., Scaramella, R., Zamorani, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A179 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourke, S., Mooley, K., & Hallinan, G. 2014, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, eds. N. Manset, & P. Forshay, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 485, 367 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bridle, A. H., & Schwab, F. R. 1999, in Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, eds. G. B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, & R. A. Perley, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 180, 371 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Briggs, D. S. 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 187, 112.02 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brouw, W. N. 1975, Methods Computat. Phys., 14, 131 [Google Scholar]
  12. CASA Team (Bean, B., et al.) 2022, PASP, 134, 114501 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Casacore Team 2019, casacore: Suite of C++ libraries for radio astronomy data processing, Astrophysics Source Code Library [record ascl:1912.002] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Top. Signal Process., 2, 793 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cotton, W. D. 1986, in Synthesis Imaging, eds. R. A. Perley, F. R. Schwab, & A. H. Bridle, 123 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cotton, W. D. 2008, PASP, 120, 439 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cotton, W. 2009, Effects of baseline dependent time averaging of uv data, Tech. rep., National Radio Astronomy Observatory [Google Scholar]
  18. de Jong, J. M. G. H. J., van Weeren, R. J., Sweijen, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dehant, V., Laguerre, R., Rekier, J., et al. 2017, Geodesy Geodyn., 8, 389 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deng, Q.-W., Wang, F., Deng, H., et al. 2022, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 22, 045014 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dewdney, P. E., Hall, P. J., Schilizzi, R. T., & Lazio, T. J. L. W. 2009, IEEE Proc., 97, 1482 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dijkema, T. J., Nijhuis, M., van Diepen, G., et al. 2023, DP3: Streaming processing pipeline for radio interferometric data, Astrophysics Source Code Library [record ascl:2305.014] [Google Scholar]
  23. Duncan, K. J., Kondapally, R., Brown, M. J. I., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A4 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Glendenning, B. E. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. G. H. Jacoby, & J. Barnes, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 101, 271 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, 285, 109 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gubanov, V. S. 1973, Soviet Ast., 16, 907 [Google Scholar]
  27. Intema, H. T., van der Tol, S., Cotton, W. D., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 1185 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Joblib Development Team 2020, Joblib: running Python functions as pipeline jobs [Google Scholar]
  29. Jonas, J., & MeerKAT Team 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, 1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kazemi, S., Yatawatta, S., Zaroubi, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1656 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kettenis, M., van Langevelde, H. J., Reynolds, C., & Cotton, B. 2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, eds. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 351, 497 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kondapally, R., Best, P. N., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A3 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kovalevsky, J. 2003, A&A, 404, 743 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maneewongvatana, S., & Mount, D. 2002, Analysis of approximate nearest neighbor searching with clustered point sets, 105 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mathews, P. M., Herring, T. A., & Buffett, B. A. 2002, J. Geophys. Res. (Solid Earth), 107, 2068 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Offringa, A. R. 2016, A&A, 595, A99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Offringa, A. R., & Smirnov, O. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 301 [Google Scholar]
  38. Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606 [Google Scholar]
  39. Owen, F. N. 2018, ApJS, 235, 34 [Google Scholar]
  40. Owen, F. N., & Morrison, G. E. 2008, AJ, 136, 1889 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rekier, J., Chao, B. F., Chen, J., et al. 2022, Surv. Geophys., 43, 149 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sabater, J., Best, P. N., Tasse, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A2 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schinckel, A. E., Bunton, J. D., Cornwell, T. J., Feain, I., & Hay, S. G. 2012, SPIE Conf. Ser., 8444, 84442A [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwab, F. R. 1984, AJ, 89, 1076 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Skipper, C. 2014, Time and channel averaging, Technical report, University of Southampton [Google Scholar]
  46. Smirnov, O. M., & Tasse, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2668 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sweijen, F., van Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2022, Nat. Astron., 6, 350 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tasse, C. 2014a, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1410.8706] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tasse, C. 2014b, A&A, 566, A127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tasse, C., Shimwell, T., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A1 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tingay, S. J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J. D., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e007 [Google Scholar]
  52. van Diepen, G., & Farris, A. 1994, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, eds. D. R. Crabtree, R. J. Hanisch, & J. Barnes, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 61, 417 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  53. van Diepen, G., Dijkema, T. J., & Offringa, A. 2018, DPPP: Default Pre-Processing Pipeline, Astrophysics Source Code Library [record ascl:1804.003] [Google Scholar]
  54. van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  55. van Weeren, R. J., Williams, W. L., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2016, ApJS, 223, 2 [Google Scholar]
  56. van Weeren, R. J., Shimwell, T. W., Botteon, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A115 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wijnholds, S. J., Willis, A. G., & Salvini, S. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 2029 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, W. L., van Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2385 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ye, H., Gull, S. F., Tan, S. M., & Nikolic, B. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.