EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 616 (August 2018) A&A, 616 (2018) A5 References
Gaia Data Release 2
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 616, August 2018
Gaia Data Release 2
Article Number A5
Number of page(s) 19
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832763
Published online 10 August 2018
  1. Allende Prieto C. 2008, Deblending RVS Spectra, GAIA-C6-SP-MSSL-CAP-003, Tech. Rep., Mullard Space Sci. Lab. (University College London) [Google Scholar]
  2. Allende Prieto C. 2009, A preliminary analysis of the RVS tests in the 3rd Astrium Radiation Campaign, GAIA-C6-SP-MSSL-CAP-005, Tech. Rep., Mullard Space Sci. Lab. (University College London) [Google Scholar]
  3. Allende Prieto, C., & Cropper, M. 2009, The Impact of the CCD-PEM Offset-Instability Anomaly on RVS Spectra, GAIA-C6-SP-MSSL-CAP-004, Tech. Rep., Mullard Space Sci. Lab. (University College London) [Google Scholar]
  4. Binney, J. J., Dehnen, W., Houk, N., Murray, C. A., & Penston, M. J. 1997, in hipparcos - Venice ’97, eds. R. M. Bonnet, E. H⊘g, P. L. Bernacca, et al., ESA SP, 402, 473 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyadjian, J. 2008, Gaia Instruments Optical Performances Delivery Explanatory Note, GAIA.ASF.TCN.PLM.00108, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyadjian, J., Arsalane, H., & Piérot, D. 2010, Gaia Payload Module optical design and performances at Critical Design Review, GAIA.ASF.TCN.PLM.00068, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  7. Chassat, F. 2009, Serial Register CTI, report at Gaia Calibration Working Group No. 4, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  8. Chassat, F. 2013, RVS Spectral Performances Assessment, GAIA.ASF.TCN.PLM.00694, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  9. Chassat, F., & Ecale, E. 2014, Gaia In-orbit Performance Status at IOCR, GAIA.ASF.RP.SAT.00850, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  10. Colangelo, G. 2010, Gaia Mission Requirements Document, GAIA.EST-RD-00553 Issue 3.0, Tech. Rep., ESA [Google Scholar]
  11. Cropper, M. 2003, in GAIA Spectroscopy: Science and Technology, ed. U. Munari, ASP Conf. Ser., 298, 75 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cropper, M., & Mason, K. O. 2001, Considerations on GAIA System Design, with Particular Reference to the Spectro Instrument/RVS-MSC-001, Tech. Rep. (University College London) [Google Scholar]
  13. Cropper, M., Katz, D., Zwitter, T., & Munari, U. 2004, The RVS Performance Capability, MSSL/Gaia-RVS/TN/015.02, Tech. Rep., Mullard Space Sci. Lab. (University College London/ESA) [Google Scholar]
  14. Cropper, M., Bingham, R., Cole, R., et al. 2005a, Design and Performance Report for Gaia-RVS, MSSL/Gaia-RVS/TN/018.02, Tech. Rep., Mullard Space Sci. Lab. (University College London/ESA) [Google Scholar]
  15. Cropper, M., Katz, D., Holland, A., et al. 2005b, in The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, eds. C. Turon, K. S. O’Flaherty, & M. A. C. Perryman, ESA SP, 576, 351 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Crowley, C., Kohley, R., Hambly, N. C., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y.-H., Chu, Y.-Q., et al. 2012, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 12, 1197 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Bruijne, J., Perryman, M., Lindegren, L., et al. 2005a, Gaia Astrometric, Photometric, and Radial-Velocity Performance Assessment Methodologies to be Used by the Industrial System-Level Teams, GAIA-JDB-022, Tech. Rep., ESA [Google Scholar]
  19. de Bruijne, J. H. J., Lammers, U., & Perryman, M. A. C. 2005b, in The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, eds. C. Turon, K. S. O’Flaherty, & M. A. C. Perryman, ESA SP, 576, 67 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ecale, E., & Chassat, F. 2010, VPU and PDHU default file allocation, GAIA.ASF.TCN.SAT.00302, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  21. Erdmann, M., Kley, E. B., & Zeitner, U. 2010, in International Conference on Space Optics, Rhodes Island, Greece, eds. E. Armandillo, N. Karafolas, & B. Cugny [Google Scholar]
  22. Famaey, B., Jorissen, A., Luri, X., et al. 2005, A&A, 430, 165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Favata, F., & Perryman, M. A. C. 1995, in Future Possibilities for Astrometry in Space, eds. M. A. C. Perryman & F. van Leeuwen, ESA SP, 379, 153 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  24. Favata, F., & Perryman, M. A. C. 1997, in hipparcos - Venice ’97, eds. R. M. Bonnet, E. Høg, P. L. Bernacca, et al., ESA SP, 402, 771 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Faye, F., & Chassat, F. 2014, Gaia in Orbit Spacecraft Open Anomaly Status at IOCR, GAIA-ASF-RP-SAT-00843, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  26. Frémat, Y., Altmann, M., Pancino, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fusero, F. 2009, PEM Response Stability Anomaly: On-Ground RVS Post-Processing for Performance Recover, GAIA.ASF.TCN.PLM.363, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  28. Fusero, F., & Chassat, F. 2011, Science Performance Budget Report, GAIA.ASF.RP.SAT.00005 Issue 5.0, Tech. Rep., EADS Astrium/ESA [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaia Collaboration (Brown, A. G. A., et al.) 2016a, A&A, 595, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gaia Collaboration (Prusti, T., et al.) 2016b, A&A, 595, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaia Project Team. 2005, Gaia Mission Requirements Document, GAIA.EST-RD-00553 issue 1.0, Tech. Rep., ESA [Google Scholar]
  32. Gilmore, G., Randich, S., Asplund, M., et al. 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hambly, N., Cropper, M., Boudreault, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A15 (Gaia 2 SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Høg, E., & Lindegren, L. 1994, in Galactic and Solar System Optical Astrometry, eds. L. V. Morrison & G. F. Gilmore, 246 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jordi, C. 2014, Photometric Relationships Between Gaia Photometry and Existing Photometric Systems, GAIA-C5-TN-UB-CJ-041-9, Tech. Rep., ICC-IEEC (University of Barcelona) [Google Scholar]
  36. Katz, D. 2003, in GAIA Spectroscopy: Science and Technology, ed. U. Munari, ASP Conf. Ser., 298, 65 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  37. Katz, D. 2005, in The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, eds. C. Turon, K. S. O’Flaherty, & M. A. C. Perryman, ESA SP, 576, 51 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  38. Katz, D., Munari, U., Cropper, M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1223 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Katz, D., Cropper, M., Sartoretti, P., et al. 2014a, Recommendations for the Revision of the RVS Operational Mode, GAIA-C6-TN-OPM-DK-021-1, Tech. Rep. (Observatoire de Paris Meudon) [Google Scholar]
  40. Katz, D., Marchal, O., Soubiran, C., et al. 2014b, A Calibration of the RVS Resolving Power by Global Spectrum Fitting, GAIA-C6-TN-OPM-DK-022-1, Tech. Rep. (Observatoire de Paris Meudon) [Google Scholar]
  41. Katz, D., Sartoretti, P., Cropper, M., et al. 2018, A&A, submitted (Gaia 2 SI) [Google Scholar]
  42. Lindegren, L., & Perryman, M. A. C. 1996, A&AS, 116, 579 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Martell, S. L., Sharma, S., Buder, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3203 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Merat, P., Safa, F., Camus, J. P., Pace, O., & Perryman, M. A. C. 1999, Baltic Astron., 8, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  46. MMS Study Team 1999, GAIA Concept & Technology Study Final Report, GAIA/MMS/TN/037.97 Issue 02, Tech. Rep., Matra Marconi Space/ESA [Google Scholar]
  47. Munari, U., Zwitter, T., Katz, D., & Cropper, M. 2003, in GAIA Spectroscopy: Science and Technology, ed. U. Munari, ASP Conf. Ser., 298, 275 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nordström, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  49. Panuzzo, P., Benson, K., Cropper, M., et al. 2014, Analysis of the Optical AC LSF of the RVS from the Commissioning Data, GAIA-C6-TN-OPM-PPA-008, Tech. Rep. (Observatoire de Paris Meudon) [Google Scholar]
  50. Panuzzo, P., Benson, K., Cropper, M., et al. 2015, Summary of RVS Payload Experts Analysis of Commissioning Data, GAIA-C6-TN-OPM-PPA-006, Tech. Rep. (Observatoire de Paris Meudon) [Google Scholar]
  51. Perryman, M. 2009, Astronomical Applications of Astrometry: Ten Years of Exploitation of the hipparcos Satellite Data (Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  52. Perryman, M. A. C. 1995, in Astronomical and Astrophysical Objectives of Sub-Milliarcsecond Optical Astrometry, eds. E. Hog & P. K. Seidelmann, IAU Symp., 166, 211 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  53. Perryman, M. A. C., de Boer, K. S., Gilmore, G., et al. 2001, A&A, 369, 339 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Safa, F., Charvet, P., & Chassat, F. 2004, in 5th International Conference on Space Optics, ed. B. Warmbein, ESA SP, 554, 291 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sartoretti, P., Katz, D., Cropper, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A6 (Gaia 2 SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  56. Seabroke, G. M., Prod’homme, T., Murray, N. J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Short, A., Crowley, C., de Bruijne, J. H. J., & Prod’homme, T. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3078 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Soubiran, C., Jasniewicz, G., Crifo, F., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A7 (Gaia 2 SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Steinmetz, M., Zwitter, T., Siebert, A., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1645 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Torra, J., Turon, C., & Blaauw, A. 1988, The European Astrometry Satellite hipparcos. Scientific aspects of the Input Catalogue preparation II (Catalunya: CIRIT) [Google Scholar]
  61. Turon, C., Crézé, M., Egret, D., et al., eds. 1992, The hipparcos input catalogue, ESA SP, 1136, [Google Scholar]
  62. Wilkinson, M. I., Vallenari, A., Turon, C., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1306 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.