EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 539 (March 2012) A&A, 539 (2012) A38 References
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 539, March 2012
Article Number A38
Number of page(s) 16
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116817
Published online 23 February 2012
  1. Abergel, A., Arab, H., Compiègne, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L96 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, H. C., & Hunt, B. R. 1977, Digital Image Restoration (Englewood Cliffs,nj: Prentice-Hall) [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulanger, F., Abergel, A., Bernard, J., et al. 1996, A&A, 312, 256 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantalupo, C. M., Borrill, J. D., Jaffe, A. H., Kisner, T. S., & Stompor, R. 2010, ApJS, 187, 212 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Champagnat, F., Le Besnerais, G., & Kulcsár, C. 2009, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 26, 1730 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charbonnier, P., Blanc-Féraud, L., Aubert, G., & Barlaud, M. 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 6, 298 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clements, D., Chanial, P., Bendo, G., et al. 2006, spire Mapmaking Algorithm Review Report, Tech. Rep., Astrophysics group at Imperial College London [Google Scholar]
  8. de Graauw, T., Helmich, F. P., Phillips, T. G., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Demoment, G. 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing,assp-37, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  10. Elad, M., & Feuer, A. 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 8, 387 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Farsiu, S., Robinson, M., Elad, M., & Milanfar, P. 2004, Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13, 1327 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giovannelli, J.-F., & Coulais, A. 2005, A&A, 439, 401 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffin, M. J. 2006, Revised Photometer sensitivity model, working version after sensitivity review meeting [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffin, M. J. 2007, The SPIRE Analogue Signal Chain and Photometer Detector Data Processing Pipeline, Tech. Rep., University of Wales Cardiff [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffin, M. J., Bock, J. J., & Gear, W. K. 2002, Appl. Opt., 41, 6543 [Google Scholar]
  16. Griffin, M., Swinyard, B., Vigroux, L., et al. 2008, in SPIE Conf., 7010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hardie, R. C., Barnard, K. J., & Armstrong, E. E. 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 6, 1621 [Google Scholar]
  19. Idier, J., 2008, Bayesian Approach to Inverse Problems (London: ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons Inc.) [Google Scholar]
  20. Künsch, H. R. 1994, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 46, 1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Leshem, A., Christou, J., Jeffs, B. D., Kuruoglu, E., & van der Veen, A. J. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Leshem, A., Kamalabadi, F., Kuruoglu, E., & van der Veen, A.-J. 2010, Signal Processing Magazine, 27 [Google Scholar]
  23. Miville-Deschênes, M., Martin, P. G., Abergel, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Molina, R., & Ripley, B. D. 1989, J. Appl. Stat., 16, 193 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mugnier, L., Fusco, T., & Conan, J.-M. 2004, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 21, 1841 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen, N., Milanfar, P., & Golub, G. 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 10, 573 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. 2000, Numerical Optimization, Series in Operations Research (New York: Springer Verlag) [Google Scholar]
  28. Orieux, F. 2009, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Sud 11 [Google Scholar]
  29. Orieux, F., Rodet, T., & Giovannelli, J.-F. 2009, in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2009), Cairo, Egypt [Google Scholar]
  30. Orieux, F., Giovannelli, J.-F., & Rodet, T. 2010, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 27, 1593 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ott, S. 2010, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIX, ed. Y. Mizumoto, K.-I. Morita, & M. Ohishi, ASP Conf. Ser., 434, 139 [Google Scholar]
  32. Park, S. C., Park, M. K., & Kang, M. G. 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing Mag., 21 [Google Scholar]
  33. Patanchon, G., Ade, P. A. R., Bock, J. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, 708 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Patti, A. J., Sezan, M. I., & Tekalp, A. M. 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 6, 1064 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  36. Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. 2000, Monte-Carlo Statistical Methods, Springer Texts in Statistics (New York,ny: Springer) [Google Scholar]
  38. Rochefort, G., Champagnat, F., Le Besnerais, G., & Giovannelli, J.-F. 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 15, 3325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodet, T., Orieux, F., Giovannelli, J.-F., & Abergel, A. 2008, IEEE J. Selec. Topics in Signal Proc., 2, 802 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shewchuk, J. R. 1994, An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without the Agonizing Pain, Tech. Rep., Carnegie Mellon University [Google Scholar]
  41. Sibthorpe, B., & Griffin, M. J. 2006, Spire Photometer Simulator, Tech. Rep., University of Wales Cardiff [Google Scholar]
  42. Sibthorpe, B., Chanial, P., & Griffin, M. J. 2009, A&A, 503, 625 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sudiwala, R. V., Griffin, M. J., & Woodcraft, A. L. 2002, International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 23, 545 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thiébaut, E. 2008, in Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation, Proc. SPIE, 7013, 70131–I [Google Scholar]
  45. Tikhonov, A., & Arsenin, V. 1977, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Washington,dc: Winston) [Google Scholar]
  46. Twomey, S. 1962, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., 10, 97 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vandewalle, P., Sbaiz, L., Vandewalle, J., & Vetterli, M. 2007, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 55, 3687 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wieprecht, E., Schreiber, J., de Jong, J., et al. 2009, in ASP Conf. Ser., ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 411, 531 [Google Scholar]
  49. Woods, N. A., Galatsanos, N. P., & Katsaggelos, A. K. 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 15, 201 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.