Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 426, Number 2, November I 2004
Page(s) 729 - 736
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20040201
Published online 11 October 2004
  1. Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bobichon, Y. 1997, Ph.D. Thesis [Google Scholar]
  3. Bobichon, Y., & Bijaoui, A. 1997, Proc. SPIE, 36 [Google Scholar]
  4. Daubechies, I., & Sweldens, W. 1998, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 4, 247 [Google Scholar]
  5. Djorgovski, S. C., de Carvalho, R. R., Gal, R. R., et al. 1998, New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys, IAU Symp., 179, 424 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dollet, C., Bijaoui, A., & Mignard, F. 2004, IJIST, submitted [Google Scholar]
  7. Erben, T., Van Waerbeke, L., Bertin, E., et al. 2001, A&A, 366, 717 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoeg, E., Arenou, F., Mignot, S., et al. 2003, Scientific requirements for the on-board processing, Technical report GAIA-CUO-117 [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, L. 1991, Ph.D. Thesis [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang, L., & Bijaoui, A. 1991, Exp. Astron., 311 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Jong, R. S., & Lacey C. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser., 170, 52 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jordi, C., Babusiaux, C., Katz, D., et al. 2003, GAIA: satellite and instrument parameters, Technical report UB-SWG-012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, A. G., Akerlof, C. W., Aldering, G., et al. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4836, 53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindegren, L. 1998, Astrometric precision of GAIA (2), Technical report SAG-LL-017 [Google Scholar]
  15. Louys, M., Starck, J. L., Mei, S., et al. 1999, A&AS, 136, 579 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mallat, S. 1999, A wavelet tour of the signal processing (New York: Academic Press) [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, F., Bijaoui, A., Touma, H., et al. 1986, Proc. SPIE, 189 [Google Scholar]
  18. Massart, B. 2000, Compression et restauration d'images pour la mission GAIA, Rapport de stage, OCA [Google Scholar]
  19. Mellier, Y., & Van Waerbeke, L. 2002, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, 3505 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Myers, A. D., Outram, P. J., Shanks, T., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 467 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murtagh, F., Starck, J. L., & Bijaoui, A. 1994, A&AS, 112, 179 [Google Scholar]
  22. Parnaudeau, J. 1999, Étude de la compression d'images pour la mission spatiale GAIA, Rapport de fin d'étude, OCA/ISIMA [Google Scholar]
  23. Perryman, M. A. C., de Boer, K. S., Gilmore, G., et al. 2001, A&A, 369, 339 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richter, G. M. 1991, 3th ESO/ST-ECF Data Analysis workshop, 37 [Google Scholar]
  25. Starck, J. L., Murtagh, F., & Bijaoui, A. 1998, Image processing and data analysis. The multiscale approach (Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  26. Stone, H. S., Tao, B., & McGuire, M. 2000, Analysis of image registration noise due to rotationally dependent aliasing, submitted Visual Communication and Image Representation [Google Scholar]
  27. Urban, S. E, Corbin, T. E., Wycoff, G. L., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1212 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Urban, S. E, Corbin, T. E., Wycoff, G. L., et al. 2001, BAAS, 33(4), 1494 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vaccari, M. 2000, GAIA Galaxy Survey, simulated observation of galaxies with ESA GAIA satellite, Master Thesis [Google Scholar]
  30. Weimer, T. 1987, Mapping the sky, past heritage and future directions, IAU Symp., 133, 29 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  31. White, R., Postman, M., & Lattanzi, M. 1992, in Digitized Optical Sky Surveys (Kluwer), 167 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yasuda, N., Fukugita, M., Narayanan, V. K., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.