Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 539, March 2012
Article Number L3
Number of page(s) 6
Section Letters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118732
Published online 22 February 2012

Online material

Appendix A

In Figs. A.1 and A.2 we show the PACS spectra at the centre of the FOV (the nominal position of B1) RA(J2000) = 20h39m102, Dec(J2000) = +68°01′105 and towards the PACS emission peak, at position RA(J2000) = 20h39m93, Dec(J2000) = +68°01′178, located at offset ( − 5′′; 7′′) with respect to the centre of the FOV.

thumbnail Fig. A.1

Spectrum of the spatial pixel at the centre of the FOV, RA(J2000) = 20h39m102, Dec(J2000) = +68°01′105.

Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. A.2

Spectrum of the spatial pixel centred at RA(J2000) = 20h39m93, Dec(J2000) = +68°01′178, corresponding to an offset ( − 5′′,7′′).

Open with DEXTER

In Table A.1 we list the fluxes at offset (0′′,0′′) and ( − 5′′,7′′) extracted from the line maps convolved at the diffraction size of the CO transition at the highest wavelength, i.e. 131 (PSF at 186 μm). They were obtained by multiplying the line surface brightness by an area of , and were used for the rotational diagram and the RADEX modelling, assuming the same source area.

Table A.1

List of CO line fluxes at offset (0′′,0′′) and ( − 5′′,7′′), derived from the line maps convolved at 131 resolution.

In Table A.2 we list the fluxes of the OH lines measured at offset ( − 5′′,7′′). Since the OH lines were detected only in one spaxel, we applied the flux correction for a point source that takes into account the size of the PSF.

Table A.2

OH line fluxes measured at offset ( − 5′′,7′′) after PSF correction for a point source.

In Fig. A.3 we show the comparison between the CO line fluxes at the centre of the PACS FOV, offset (0′′,0′′), and three models: the best-fit model obtained considering only the PACS lines (Jup14) with n = 2 × 104 cm-3  and Tkin = 1080 K; the best-fit model obtained considering also the HIFI CO (13–12) and (10–9) lines with n = 2 × 105 cm-3  and Tkin = 580 K and the LTE model with kinetic temperature equal to the excitation temperature derived from the rotational diagram, with n = 2 × 107 cm-3  and Tkin = 207 K. In Fig. A.4 the same models are shown compared to the CO line fluxes at the peak of the CO emission, i.e. offset (−5′′,7′′).

thumbnail Fig. A.3

Fit of the CO lines at offset (0′′,0′′), taking into account only PACS data (dashed curve), adding the HIFI lines (solid curve) and assuming the LTE temperature (dotted curve). Squares are the PACS fluxes and bars represent the range of fluxes estimated from HIFI lines. Error bars include the statistical error from the line fitting and the 10% calibration uncertainty.

Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. A.4

Fit of the CO lines at offset (−5′′,7′′). Error bars include the statistical error from the line fitting and the 10% calibration uncertainty.

Open with DEXTER


© ESO, 2012

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.