Issue |
A&A
Volume 520, September-October 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | L7 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Letters | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015359 | |
Published online | 29 September 2010 |
Online Material
Appendix A: The determination of
p
Although partly discussed in previous papers (e.g. Hutsemékers et al. 2005), we provide some details of the simulations
performed to estimate
,
the small additional
linear polarization needed to reproduce the observed alignments of
quasar polarization vectors. These simulations extend those discussed
in Hutsemékers & Lamy (2001), accounting for the
measurement errors.
![]() |
Figure A.1:
The effect of the addition of a small systematic polarization
|
Open with DEXTER |
We first modeled the distribution of the debiased polarization degree
in the full quasar sample (from Hutsemékers et al. 2005,
including objects with ). We found that it was reasonably
well reproduced by a half-gaussian distribution of zero mean and
unitary variance. According to this distribution, we randomly generate
80 values of the polarization degree p, most of them lying between
0% and 3%. We also generate 80 values of the polarization angle
,
uniformly distributed between 0
and 180
.
From p and
,
we compute the normalized Stokes parameters q and
u to which we add a systematic polarization
(we
assume for simplicity that
,
which corresponds to add
linear polarization at
). We also add random noise
uniformly generated between -
and +
,
in agreement with
the uncertainties in the measurements (Hutsemékers et al. 2005). Finally, from the modified q and u we
recompute p,
,
and
in the usual way and
select the good quality measurements with the criteria previously
used, i.e.,
and
.
This
leaves us with
60 polarization values. This is comparable to
the number of objects in the alignment region (cf. Fig. 7 of
Hutsemékers et al. 2005, to which these simulations should
be compared).
The results are illustrated in Fig. A.1 for
%, 0.25%, and 0.5% from top to bottom. We see that, in the
distribution ofpolarization angles, a significant deviation to
uniformity is only obtained for
.
At the same time, the distribution of the polarization degree
does not appear significantly modified. Since this additional
polarization at a single polarization angle is likely unrealistic,
should be seen as a lower limit, although it
cannot be much higher. Indeed, much larger values would make the
distribution of the polarization degree incompatible with the
observations (e.g. Hutsemékers & Lamy 2001).
Appendix B: Circular polarization due to photon-pseudoscalar mixing
In the weak mixing case, photons with polarizations parallel to an
external magnetic field
that propagate through the distance
L can decay into pseudoscalars with a probability
![]() |
(B.1) |
where








![]() |
(B.2) |
acquired by the photons during propagation, which results in circular polarization. As noted by Raffelt & Stodolky (1988), both effects are on the order of

Assuming
,
we have
Mpc, where
is the frequency in GHz and
the
electronic density in cm-3. At optical wavelengths (
GHz) and under various conditions (e.g.
cm-3 and
Mpc in superclusters, or
cm-3 and
Gpc in the intergalactic medium),
.
With a frequency bandwidth
and
,
we find that
,
where
represents
the average value of
.
Similar estimates are
derived when accounting for density fluctuations (Jain et al. 2002).
Adopting the convention of u=0 and q>0 for polarization vectors
parallel to ,
the dichroism and birefringence induced by
photon-pseudoscalar mixing modify the polarization according to
q | = | ![]() |
|
u | = | ![]() |
(B.3) |
![]() |
= | ![]() |
where q0 and u0 are the normalized Stokes parameters representing the initial linear polarization state and





Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.