Open Access
Table 3.
Summary of the cases discussed in this work.
| Star-forming | Stellar | Gaseous | Gas rich | Gas poor | Possible | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| or quenched? | asymmetry | asymmetry | end-product | of the full sample | |||
| Case 1 | SF | ✗ | ✗ | – | – | Secular evolution | 26.7% |
| Case 2 | Both | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | RPS, tidal interactions, |
|
| mergers, harassment | |||||||
| Case 3 | Both | ✗ | ✓ | – | – | RPS, tidal interactions, | |
| AGN | |||||||
| Case 4 | Both | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✗ | Minor merger | 11.0% |
| Case 5 | Both | ✗ | – | ✗ | ✓ | Dry merger | 8.7% |
| Case 6 | Both | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | Starvation, quenching | 28.1% |
| maintenance |
Notes. “–” means that the feature is indifferent for the corresponding case. The total percentage is not equal to 100% as 11.0% of the analyzed galaxies did not fit any of the cases discussed. Such cases are displayed as “inconclusive” in Fig. 6.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.