Table 2
Standard deviation of the RV residuals between TILARA configurations and comparison pipelines.
| Method comparison | Standard deviation (m s−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| ESPRESSO 18 | ESPRESSO 19 | |
| TILARA (with sigma-clip) - CCF | 0.33 | 0.59 |
| TILARA (with down-weight) - CCF | 0.33 | 0.55 |
| TILARA (with sigma-clip) - ARVE (1) | 0.38 | 0.56 |
| TILARA (with down-weight) - ARVE (1) | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| TILARA (with sigma-clip) - LBL (2) | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| TILARA (with down-weight) - LBL (2) | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| TILARA (with sigma-clip) - s-BART (3) | 0.33 | 0.57 |
| TILARA (with down-weight) - s-BART (3) | 0.44 | 0.56 |
Notes. Standard deviation of the RV residuals between the two TILARA configurations – down-weighting (TDW) and sigma-clipping (TSC) – and four comparison pipelines. Values were computed separately for ESPRESSO 18 and ESPRESSO 19 observations and are given in meters per second. (1) Al Moulla (2025); (2) Artigau et al. (2022); (3) Silva et al. (2022).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.