Open Access

Table 1

Hα results for the PHANGS MUSE galaxies.

Galaxy αMK αpy nHII Fmin,Hα Rmed αMK,inpy,in nHII,in αMK,out, αpy,out nHII,out
IC5332 1.72 ± 0.033 1.74 ± 0.020 476 11 000 1.99 0.25 1.74, 1.75 258 1.70, 1.73 218
NGC0628 1.66 ± 0.016 1.68 ± 0.017 1421 30 002 3.63 0.26 1.73, 1.76 650 1.61, 1.66 771
NGC1087 1.56 ± 0.021 1.60 ± 0.013 588 50 476 3.60 0.53 1.48, 1.66 371 1.76, 1.71 217
NGC1300 1.68 ± 0.025 1.71 ± 0.020 745 20 000 7.93 0.48 1.68, 1.60 398 1.68, 1.62 347
NGC1365 1.68 ± 0.032 1.69 ± 0.027 419 100 000 13.78 0.40 1.74, 1.76 185 1.64, 1.73 234
NGC1385 1.42 ± 0.020 1.47 ± 0.013 710 26 982 3.53 0.41 1.29, 1.57 438 1.74, 1.63 272
NGC1433 1.86 ± 0.036 1.87 ± 0.035 588 30 000 8.76 0.52 1.88, 1.60 292 1.84, 1.66 296
NGC1512 1.78 ± 0.042 1.82 ± 0.040 324 30 000 7.55 0.33 1.83, 1.61 163 1.74, 1.67 161
NGC1566 1.53 ± 0.014 1.55 ± 0.013 1078 31 455 5.64 0.30 1.46, 1.59 665 1.68, 1.67 413
NGC1672 1.56 ± 0.020 1.60 ± 0.021 694 47 592 8.12 0.47 1.55, 1.62 371 1.57, 1.71 323
NGC2835 1.69 ± 0.030 1.72 ± 0.033 488 52 360 3.61 0.32 1.63, 1.63 267 1.78, 1.71 221
NGC3351 1.67 ± 0.024 1.71 ± 0.020 670 19 347 3.99 0.38 1.66, 1.54 355 1.69, 1.61 315
NGC3627 1.45 ± 0.017 1.50 ± 0.017 833 90 250 4.46 0.26 1.39, 1.64 433 1.53, 1.72 400
NGC4254 1.50 ± 0.013 1.54 ± 0.007 1847 57 359 4.91 0.51 1.42, 1.58 1106 1.64, 1.68 741
NGC4303 1.51 ± 0.014 1.55 ± 0.009 1613 48 167 5.51 0.32 1.45, 1.55 961 1.61, 1.66 652
NGC4321 1.64 ± 0.020 1.67 ± 0.014 1005 61 501 6.39 0.47 1.59, 1.58 560 1.72, 1.69 445
NGC4535 1.50 ± 0.013 1.53 ± 0.010 1260 9067 5.62 0.30 1.52, 1.37 629 1.49, 1.45 631
NGC5068 1.60 ± 0.021 1.62 ± 0.017 930 44 785 2.09 0.37 1.58, 1.55 471 1.63, 1.66 459
NGC7496 1.59 ± 0.032 1.62 ± 0.017 377 20 822 4.28 0.47 1.61, 1.47 213 1.58, 1.57 164
M33 1.41 ± 0.026 1.51 ± 0.018 368 60 000 3.98a 0.53 1.28, 1.45 190 1.52, 1.59 178

Notes. Sample of galaxies observed by Santoro et al. (2022) followed by results from fitting the Hα flux distribution with the Maschberger & Kroupa (2009) method and powerlaw.py algorithm (Alstott et al. 2014). Second column is overall slope, where the second number is determined with powerlaw.py. Third column is the number of HII regions with a flux greater than the value in Col. 4 expressed in units of 10−20 erg cm−2 sec−1. Column 4 is designed to be the true completeness limit as explained in the text. Column 5 gives the median galactocentric radius of the HII region sample for that galaxy in kpc and as a fraction of R25. The following two columns provide the inner slope with the two methods and the number of HII regions. The next two columns are the same but for the outer parts. a Corrected for a distance of 840 kpc. Due to the lower number of HII regions, the uncertainties on α are higher when the inner and outer parts are evaluated separately.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.