Table A.1
Atomic data and abundances for individual lines analysed.
| λ (Å) | species | χ (eV) | log gf | EW (mA) | log ϵ (X) (dex) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7771.94 | 01 | 9.15 | +0.37 | 26.64 | +7.13 | 1 |
| 7774.17 | 01 | 9.15 | +0.22 | 21.02 | +7.14 | 1 |
| 7775.39 | 01 | 9.15 | 0.00 | 13.73 | +7.12 | 1 |
| 5889.95 | Na 1 | 0.00 | +0.11 | 177.37 | +4.62 | 1 |
| 5895.92 | Nal | 0.00 | −0.19 | 150.18 | +4.46 | 1 |
| 2776.69 | Mg 1 | 2.71 | −0.12 | syn | +5.39 | 1 |
| 2779.83 | Mg 1 | 2.72 | +0.38 | syn | +5.37 | 1 |
| 2782.97 | Mg 1 | 2.72 | −0.12 | syn | +5.43 | 1 |
| 2846.72 | Mg 1 | 2.71 | −1.32 | syn | +5.31 | 1 |
| 3829.35 | Mg 1 | 2.71 | −0.23 | 166.60 | +5.60 | 1 |
| 3986.75 | Mg 1 | 4.35 | −1.06 | 22.42 | +5.55 | 1 |
| 4057.51 | Mg 1 | 4.35 | −0.90 | 23.82 | +5.42 | 1 |
References. (1) NIST Kramida et al. (2020); (2) Pehlivan Rhodin et al. (2017); (3) NIST Kramida et al. (2020) for log(g f ) value and VALD Piskunov et al. (1995); Pakhomov et al. (2019) for HFS; (4) Träbert et al. (1999) for log(g f ) value and Roederer & Lawler (2021) for HFS; (5) Den Hartog et al. (2023); (6) Den Hartog et al. (2021b); (7) Lawler & Dakin (1989) for log g and Kurucz (2011) for HFS; (8) Lawler et al. (2019); (9) Lawler et al. (2013); (10) Wood et al. (2013); (11) Pickering et al. (2001), with corrections given in Pickering et al. (2002); (12) Wood et al. (2014a) for log(g f ) value and HFS; (13) Sobeck et al. (2007), (14) Lawler et al. (2017), (15) Gurell et al. (2010); (16) Nilsson et al. (2006); (17) Den Hartog et al. (2011) for both log(g f ) value and hfs; (18) O’Brian et al. (1991); (19) Belmonte et al. (2017); (20) Den Hartog et al. (2014); (21) Ruffoni et al. (2014); (22) Den Hartog et al. (2019); (23) Meléndez & Barbuy (2009); (24) Lawler et al. (2015) for log(g f ) values and HFS; (25) Lawler et al. (2018) for log(g f ) value and Roederer et al. (2022b)for HFS; (26) Wood et al. (2014b); (27) Fedchak & Lawler (1999); (28) Roederer & Lawler (2012); (29) Bié-mont et al. (2011); (30) Ljung et al. (2006); (31) Malcheva et al. (2006); (32) Nilsson et al. (2010), including HFS; (33) Sikström et al. (2001); (34) Xu et al. (2004); (35) Kramida et al. (2018), using HFS/IS from McWilliam (1998); (36) Lawler et al. (2001a), using HFS from Ivans et al. (2006) when available; (37) Lawler et al. (2009); (38) Li et al. (2007), using HFS from Sneden et al. (2009); (39) Den Hartog et al. (2003), using HFS/IS from Roederer et al. (2008) when available; (40) Lawler et al. (2006), using HFS/IS from Roederer et al. (2008) when available; (41) Lawler et al. (2001c), using HFS/IS from Ivans et al. (2006); (42) Den Hartog et al. (2006), (43) Lawler et al. (2001b), using HFS from Lawler et al. (2001d); (44) Wickliffe et al. (2000); (45) Lawler et al. (2004), using HFS from Lawler et al. (2009); (46) Lawler et al. (2008); (47) Wickliffe & Lawler (1997); (48) Sneden et al. (2009) for log(g f ) value and HFS/IS; (49) Roederer et al. (2010) for log(g f ) value and Den Hartog et al. (2020) for HFS; (50) Den Hartog et al. (2021a); (51) Lawler et al. (2007); (52) Den Hartog et al. (2005) for log(g f ) value and HFS/IS; (54) Den Hartog et al. (2005) for log(g f ) value only; (55) Hannaford et al. (1981) for log(g f ) value and Demidov et al. (2021)for HFS; (56) Nilsson et al. (2002)
Notes. The complete version of this table is available at the CDS. A subset is shown here to illustrate its form and content.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.