Fig. 5

Download original image
Methodology for comparing analytical (red) and empirical (blue) noise estimates. Empirical errors are obtained from on-sky data cubes by projecting the ERR extension values onto the template, as well as by calculating the spatial standard deviation of the CCF. These empirical values are then compared to the analytical errors derived from FastCurves, both with and without consideration of the systematic noise component (estimated with MIRISim), in addition to the fundamental noise sources.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.