Table 1.
Fraction of simulations crossing the 3σ threshold (i.e., ℱ3σ given in percent). The total number of simulations is 1000.
Fvar | AI | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sim | TS | W | No-cut | Soft-cut | Hard-cut | No-cut | Soft-cut | Hard-cut |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
Sim-null (sanity check) | Averaged | ⌀W 3R | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
Averaged | ⌀W 1R | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.5% | |
Counted | ⌀W 3R | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.1% | |
Counted | ⌀W 1R | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | |
Averaged | WG 3R | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | |
Averaged | WT 1R | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.5% | |
Counted | WG 3R | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
Counted | WT 1R | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.1% | |
Sim-best (special-case) | Averaged | ⌀W 3R | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Averaged | ⌀W 1R | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.6% | |
Counted | ⌀W 3R | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.2% | 0.4% | 1.1% | 4.7% | |
Counted | ⌀W 1R | 0.3% | 0.5% | 4.7% | 0.4% | 1.2% | 8.8% | |
Averaged | WG 3R | 89.6% | 89.1% | 84.4% | 83.6% | 83.8% | 83.7% | |
Averaged | WT 1R | 5.9% | 6.3% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | |
Counted | WG 3R | 96.7% | 96.7% | 96.8% | 98.7% | 98.7% | 98.7% | |
Counted | WT 1R | 8.4% | 9.3% | 20.1% | 24.0% | 25.3% | 47.4% | |
Sim-mid (special-case) | Averaged | ⌀W 3R | 0.5% | 1.7% | 3.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.2% |
Averaged | ⌀W 1R | 0.9% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.4% | |
Counted | ⌀W 3R | 0.8% | 2.7% | 55.7% | 1.5% | 9.9% | 97.2% | |
Counted | ⌀W 1R | 2.4% | 8.8% | 94.4% | 4.4% | 25.3% | 100.0% | |
Averaged | WG 3R | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | |
Averaged | WT 1R | 25.2% | 17.8% | 0.2% | 8.9% | 5.4% | 0.1% | |
Counted | WG 3R | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | |
Counted | WT 1R | 46.8% | 49.2% | 82.3% | 87.5% | 87.9% | 99.7% | |
Sim-0.2𝒮 (realistic) | Averaged | ⌀W 3R | 1.8% | 4.2% | 1.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Averaged | ⌀W 1R | 3.9% | 7.4% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% | |
Counted | ⌀W 3R | 5.0% | 14.2% | 24.8% | 16.7% | 44.2% | 55.6% | |
Counted | ⌀W 1R | 15.6% | 43.2% | 55.1% | 36.9% | 81.7% | 80.3% | |
Averaged | WG 3R | 53.6% | 50.0% | 31.8% | 46.8% | 42.9% | 27.9% | |
Averaged | WT 1R | 58.9% | 41.7% | 2.1% | 26.6% | 14.8% | 1.0% | |
Counted | WG 3R | 68.7% | 68.6% | 58.8% | 83.6% | 83.0% | 72.9% | |
Counted | WT 1R | 84.8% | 84.8% | 69.7% | 97.8% | 97.5% | 88.4% | |
Sim-𝒮 (sanity check) | Averaged | ⌀W 3R | 61.7% | 80.0% | 38.9% | 14.6% | 25.0% | 13.0% |
Averaged | ⌀W 1R | 88.2% | 95.3% | 2.2% | 29.0% | 29.3% | 1.3% | |
Counted | ⌀W 3R | 99.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Counted | ⌀W 1R | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Averaged | WG 3R | 100.0% | 100.0% | 98.8% | 97.5% | 97.8% | 95.5% | |
Averaged | WT 1R | 100.0% | 100.0% | 13.5% | 88.9% | 77.7% | 7.1% | |
Counted | WG 3R | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Counted | WT 1R | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Notes. Column (1) refers to the sample of simulated blazars (see Sect. 3.1). Column (2) refers to the TS parameter (see Sect. 3.2); Averaged and Counted refer to the averaging-based and counting-based TS parameters, respectively. Column (3) refers to the weighting scheme as well as the neutrino error region size (see Sect. 3.3.1); ⌀W, WG, and WT imply no weighting, Gaussian weighting, and top-hat weighting, respectively; 1R and 3R indicate the neutrino error region edge is Rϕ and 3Rϕ, respectively. Columns (4) and (7) refer to the no-cut neutrino subsample, columns (5) and (8) refer to the soft-cut neutrino subsample, and columns (6) and (9) refer to the hard-cut neutrino subsample (see Sect. 3.3.2). In columns (4)–(6), Fvar is used as the variability measure; while in columns (7)–(9), AI is used as the variability measure.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.