Open Access

Fig. A.1

image

Download original image

Comparison of our catalog with other catalogs from literatures using LAMOST or APOGEE as references. The first row: comparison between our catalog and a catalog from Andrae et al. (2023b), annotated with the means and standard deviations of the differences in Teff, log ɡ, and [M/H]. The second row: histograms in red showing the differences in atmospheric parameters between our catalog and the catalog from LAMOST, while histograms in black showing the differences between the catalog from Andrae et al. (2023b) and the one from LAMOST, with means and standard deviations annotated. The last two rows: similar to the first and second rows, we compare our catalog with the catalog from Zhang et al. (2023), using APOGEE as a reference in those panels in the last row.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.