Open Access

Table 3.

Best-fitting model parameters for ρ Ophiuchi, Perseus, and W43 in intensity.

ρ Ophiuchi Perseus W43



Parameter With QUIJOTE Without With QUIJOTE Without With QUIJOTE Without
EM (pc⋅cm−6) 16 11 + 16 $ 16^{+16}_{-11} $ 14 10 + 15 $ 14^{+15}_{-10} $ 33 ± 8 30 11 + 9 $ 30^{+9}_{-11} $ 3974 ± 204 3945 ± 200
Td (K) 22 . 5 0.7 + 0.5 $ 22.5^{+0.5}_{-0.7} $ 22 . 6 0.6 + 0.5 $ 22.6^{+0.5}_{-0.6} $ 19.3 ± 0.7 19.1 ± 0.8 23.4 ± 1.0 23.4 ± 1.0
βd 1.60 ± 0.05 1.57 ± 0.04 1.60 ± 0.08 1.64 ± 0.10 1.68 ± 0.06 1.69 ± 0.05
τ250(×10−4) 5 . 5 0.3 + 0.6 $ 5.5^{+0.6}_{-0.3} $ 5 . 4 0.3 + 0.5 $ 5.4^{+0.5}_{-0.3} $ 2 . 1 0.2 + 0.4 $ 2.1^{+0.4}_{-0.2} $ 2 . 2 0.3 + 0.5 $ 2.2^{+0.5}_{-0.3} $ 32 . 2 4.1 + 4.6 $ 32.2^{+4.6}_{-4.1} $ 32 . 6 4.1 + 4.6 $ 32.6^{+4.6}_{-4.1} $
ΔTCMB(μK) 30 ± 26 23 ± 27 14 ± 22 5 ± 23 8 ± 28 8 ± 28
AAME (Jy) 26.7 ± 1.7 27.5 ± 1.8 30.8 ± 2.3 31 . 3 3.0 + 3.4 $ 31.3^{+3.4}_{-3.0} $ 208 ± 19 214 ± 23
νAME (GHz) 30 . 2 1.6 + 2.1 $ 30.2^{+2.1}_{-1.6} $ 27 . 5 3.5 + 2.7 $ 27.5^{+2.7}_{-3.5} $ 27 . 4 1.4 + 1.7 $ 27.4^{+1.7}_{-1.4} $ 22 . 3 4.6 + 5.0 $ 22.3^{+5.0}_{-4.6} $ 24.9 ± 1.5 22.9 ± 3.3
WAME 0.57 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.17 0.54 ± 0.07 1.0 ± 0.3 0.75 ± 0.10 0 . 84 0.14 + 0.11 $ 0.84^{+0.11}_{-0.14} $

χ red 2 $ \chi^{2}_{\mathrm{red}} $ 0.45 0.69 0.27 0.26 0.92 1.02

Notes. We compare the two cases in which we include and exclude the QUIJOTE-MFI flux densities in the fit. In the last line we show the reduced chi-squared of each fit.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.