Open Access

Table 2.

Compton-thick AGN fractions.

Sample Fraction Redshift
This work ( × ) 0 . 24 0.05 + 0.05 $ 0.24^{+0.05}_{-0.05} $ < 0.05
Burlon et al. (2011)( × ) 0 . 20 0.06 + 0.09 $ 0.20^{+0.09}_{-0.06} $ < 0.1
Ricci et al. (2017)( × ) 0 . 27 0.04 + 0.04 $ 0.27^{+0.04}_{-0.04} $ < 0.1
Torres-Albà et al. (2021)( × ) 0 . 20 0.05 + 0.05 $ 0.20^{+0.05}_{-0.05} $ < 0.01
Ueda et al. (2014)( × ) 0 . 27 0.05 + 0.05 $ 0.27^{+0.05}_{-0.05} $ < 0.1
Buchner et al. (2015)( † ) 0 . 43 0.10 + 0.10 $ 0.43^{+0.10}_{-0.10} $ ≈0
Laloux et al. (2023)( † ), (1) 0 . 21 0.10 + 0.16 $ 0.21^{+0.16}_{-0.10} $ < 0.5
Akylas et al. (2024)(2) 0 . 25 0.05 + 0.05 $ 0.25^{+0.05}_{-0.05} $ z< 0.02
Boorman et al. (2024)(3) 0 . 35 0.06 + 0.06 $ 0.35^{+0.06}_{-0.06} $ < 0.044
Ananna et al. (2019)(4) 0 . 33 0.10 + 0.10 $ 0.33^{+0.10}_{-0.10} $ < 0.1

Notes. Column Description: (1) Sample. (2) Compton-thick fraction (NH = 1024 − 25 cm−2). (3) Redshift. The × denotes fractions are based on BAT in the local Universe. ( † )symbol denotes fractions based on XMM-Newton and Chandra observations at higher redshifts. (1)Estimate based on mid-IR priors. (2)AGN sample selected using WISE warm colours. (3)AGN sample selected using warm IRAS colours. (4)Based on X-ray background synthesis models.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.