Comparison of Herschel and ArTéMiS observations of massive filaments

Home

All issues

Volume 695 (March 2025)

A&A, 695 (2025) A242

Full HTML

Open Access

Table A.5

Results of the simulations comparing 1 D and 2 D Plummer fitting to a simulated filament.

S/N_f	Method	N₀	R_flat	p	a	b	∆r	FWHM
2.72	1D	1.41 ± 0.91	9.85 ± 14.31	2.75 ± 4.03	0.88 ± 0.43	0.0± 0.0	0.12 ± 5.38	14.92 ± 33.11
2.72	2D	1.41 ± 0.02	9.86 ± 0.27	2.74 ± 0.03	0.88 ± 0.01	0.0± 0.0	0.13 ± 0.05	21.69 ± 0.57

8.49	1D	1.29 ± 0.23	4.59 ± 4.39	1.67 ± 1.2	0.09 ± 0.17	0.0± 0.0	0.01 ± 0.21	21.77 ± 7.26
8.49	2D	1.29 ± 0.0	4.59 ± 0.02	1.67 ± 0.0	0.09 ± 0.0	0.0± 0.0	0.01 ± 0.01	24.01 ± 0.22

26.66	1D	1.22 ± 0.09	3.72 ± 0.97	1.68 ± 0.23	0.03 ± 0.07	0.0± 0.0	0.01 ± 0.07	17.35 ± 1.85
26.66	2D	1.22 ± 0.0	3.72 ± 0.01	1.68 ± 0.0	0.03 ± 0.0	0.0± 0.0	0.01 ± 0.02	19.39 ± 0.08

Notes. Median Plummer parameters derived using 1 D and 2 D convolution of a simulated filament with S/N = 100. Three S /N_filament values are tested.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.