Table 2.
Information for the four w(θ) measured from the mock sample.
| Galaxy catalogue | Random catalogue | Label | Biased? | Colour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unselected catalogue | UR | “No selection” | Unbiased |  |
| Selected catalogue | UR | “UR” | Biased |  |
| Selected catalogue | True OR | “True OR” | Unbiased |  |
| Selected catalogue | Recovered OR | “Rec. OR” | Unbiased |  |
Notes. The ‘Label’ column indicates the aliases of the w(θ) values in the following discussion and figures; the ‘Biased?’ column indicates whether the 2PCF is biased; the ‘Colour’ column indicates the colours of the data points shown in the figures. The ‘No selection’ (first row) and ‘True OR’ (third row) cases are unbiased benchmarks and the ‘UR’ (second row) case is a biased measurement. The ‘Recovered OR’ case (fourth row) is the 2PCF that we used to validate our method.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.