Open Access

Table 3.

Comparison of core and envelope rotation rates obtained with the ensemble inversions and different synthetic rotation profiles.

Profile Method Ωcore/(2π) σrand σref Ωenv/(2π) σrand σref
Core step Ensemble 690 13 5 100 14 7
eMOLA 690 6 102 6

Envelope step Ensemble 749 13 5 98 14 8
eMOLA 749 6 100 6

Convective power law Ensemble 750 13 4 153 14 6
eMOLA 750 6 152 6

Envelope step, Ωenv/(2π) = 100 nHz

Ωcoreenv = 1 Ensemble 100 14 1 100 14 2
Ωcoreenv = 2 Ensemble 200 14 1 100 18 1
Ωcoreenv = 3 Ensemble 300 13 1 100 14 2
Ωcoreenv = 5 Ensemble 500 13 3 99 14 5
Ωcoreenv = 10 Ensemble 998 13 8 97 14 11

Core step, Ωcoreenv = 20

Ωenv/(2π) = 100 nHz Ensemble 1826 13 15 99 14 23
Ωenv/(2π) = 50 nHz Ensemble 913 13 8 50 14 12

Notes. The profile type used to compute the synthetic rotational splittings is given in the first column. Core and envelope rotation rates were calculated with target radii of r0/R = 0.003 and r0/R = 0.98, respectively. When varying the core-to-envelope ratio the envelope rotation rate was set to 50 or a 100 nHz. The eMOLA results are taken from Ahlborn et al. (2022) (their Table 1).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.