Notes. The full electronic version of this table is available at Zenodo. The top half of this extract shows observed 4f³5d−4f³5ſ transitions in the grating spectra, the bottom half shows 4f³6p − 4f³(7s + 6d) transitions observed in both the grating and FT spectra. The columns are: (1) spectrum of observation, where ‘g’ indicates line observed only in the grating Nd VS spectra and ‘f’ indicates line observed in both the Nd-Ar PDL FT and Nd VS spectra, where only the higher accuracy FT spectral lines are presented, (2)–(3) signal-to-noise ratio and full width at half maximum of the fitted FT spectral line, (4) approximate relative intensity corresponding to relative photon flux for ‘f’ and to relative energy flux for ‘g’, where lines above 2000 Å are on the same scale as those in Tables 6 and 7 of Ding et al. (2024) and lines below 2000 Å scale between 0 and 100. (5)–(6) weighted TP and log of the weighted (absorption) oscillator strength calculated using the Cowan code, where ɡ_u and ɡ_l refer to statistical weights of the upper and lower energy levels, respectively, (7)–(8) observed vacuum wavelength for ‘g’ and vacuum wavenumber for ‘f’, (9) Ritz wavenumber from level optimisation, (10) wavenumber difference between observed and Ritz values, (11) Ritz air wavelength for lines above 2000 Å converted using the three-term dispersion formula from Peck & Reeder (1972), Ritz vacuum wavelengths are given for lines below 2000 Å, (12)–(13) energy levels associated with the transition, their energies are in columns (14)–(15), respectively, and (16) contains comments of the observed transition, where ‘B/W’ indicates a blended or weak line with unreliable wavenumber and intensity, which was omitted from level optimisation. Uncertainties of columns (7), (8), and (9) are in parentheses in units of the final decimal place.