Table 4
Bayesian evidence of models evaluating the 233 d candidate.
Name | Model | Npl | Npar | ln ![]() |
Δ ln ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P233: E18, E19 (Npoint = 149 × 2) | |||||
D | A+cycN | 0 | 26 | −447.2 | 0.0 |
N1 | D+1peN0.5 | 1 | 31 | −449.4 | −2.2 |
N2 | D+1peU50 | 1 | 31 | −449.6 | −2.4 |
S1 | D+1peU100 | 1 | 31 | − | − |
S2 | D+1peU100 | 1 | 31 | − | − |
P233: E18, E19, H15, HAN, CAR (Npoint = 792 × 2) | |||||
K1 | GP+cycU | 0 | 39 | −4123.0 | 0.0 |
O1 | K1+1peU50 | 1 | 44 | −4123.5 | −0.5 |
Notes. Model selection based on Bayesian evidence evaluating the 233 d candidate planet. Different models as in Table 3. Model S1 and S2 are simulations with injected planets. N and U indicate normal and uniform priors, N0.5 for (Porb, σP) with Porb = 233 d and σP = 0.5 d. U50 and U100 for
/(200, x) with x = 250 and 300 d. Here, npe indicates n Keplerian orbits.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.