Open Access

Table B.1.

Summary of the regression analysis for the main sample with redshift 0.015 < z < 0.06 a

Sample Intercept α Slope β Intrinsic scatter σ N groups Figure
Optical D10 vs. Lr, 3σ 1.448 ± 0.038 0.585 ± 0.066 0.410 ± 0.026 279 2 & 3
Optical D10 vs. Lr, full 1.568 ± 0.043 0.507 ± 0.088 0.485 ± 0.032 297 2 & 3
Compact D10 vs. Lr 1.425 ± 0.064 0.649 ± 0.098 0.408 ± 0.042 120 2 & 3
Extended D10 vs. Lr 1.428 ± 0.069 0.631 ± 0.098 0.352 ± 0.041 95 2 & 3
Optical Lr vs. σv, 3σ 3.623 ± 0.049 2.191 ± 0.220 0.319 ± 0.037 279 4 & 5
Optical Lr vs. σv, full 3.573 ± 0.049 2.100 ± 0.260 0.369 ± 0.037 297 4 & 5
Compact Lr vs. σv 3.660 ± 0.066 1.978 ± 0.234 0.286 ± 0.054 120 4 & 5
Extended Lr vs. σv 3.710 ± 0.071 1.906 ± 0.236 0.264 ± 0.054 95 4 & 5
Optical D10 vs. σv, 3σ 1.456 ± 0.050 1.378 ± 0.271 0.445 ± 0.034 279 10 & 11
Optical D10 vs. σv, full 1.504 ± 0.052 1.378 ± 0.272 0.476 ± 0.034 297 10 & 11
Compact D10 vs. σv 1.464 ± 0.081 1.333 ± 0.339 0.455 ± 0.054 120 10 & 11
Extended D10 vs. σv 1.496 ± 0.086 1.294 ± 0.319 0.390 ± 0.053 95 10 & 11
Compact Lr vs. LX 3.728 ± 0.072 0.338 ± 0.074 0.487 ± 0.050 120 12 & 13
Extended Lr vs. LX 3.796 ± 0.071 0.366 ± 0.058 0.400 ± 0.046 95 12 & 13
Compact D10 vs. LX 1.531 ± 0.074 0.239 ± 0.075 0.508 ± 0.052 120 8 & 9
Extended D10 vs. LX 1.581 ± 0.075 0.230 ± 0.065 0.433 ± 0.050 95 8 & 9
Compact LX vs. σv 98.985 ± 0.157 3.092 ± 0.692 0.693 ± 0.103 120 6 & 7
Extended LX vs. σv 99.009 ± 0.185 3.292 ± 0.671 0.734 ± 0.119 95 6 & 7
Compact LX vs. σv, D < 5. 98.588 ± 0.884 5.764 ± 5.033 0.321 ± 0.242 60 14 & 15
Extended LX vs. σv, D10 < 5. 99.444 ± 0.936 2.815 ± 4.513 0.469 ± 0.361 43 14 & 15
Compact LX vs. σv, D10 > 5. 98.317 ± 0.505 5.500 ± 1.126 0.413 ± 0.134 60 14 & 15
Extended LX vs. σv, D10 > 5. 98.937 ± 0.502 4.636 ± 1.011 0.475 ± 0.133 52 14 & 15
Optical Lr vs. σv, D10 < 5. 3.506 ± 0.063 2.130 ± 0.705 0.276 ± 0.067 152 16 & 17
Compact Lr vs. σv, D10 < 5. 3.514 ± 0.081 1.976 ± 0.567 0.176 ± 0.109 60 16 & 17
Extended Lr vs. σv, D10 < 5. 3.554 ± 0.094 1.788 ± 0.552 0.209 ± 0.089 43 16 & 17
Optical Lr vs. σv, D10 > 5. 3.778 ± 0.070 1.946 ± 0.253 0.319 ± 0.055 127 16 & 17
Compact Lr vs. σv, D10 > 5. 3.849 ± 0.090 1.708 ± 0.259 0.274 ± 0.066 60 16 & 17
Extended Lr vs. σv, D10 > 5. 3.891 ± 0.093 1.673 ± 0.238 0.235 ± 0.063 52 16 & 17
Compact Lr vs. LX, D10 < 5. 3.515 ± 0.081 0.077 ± 0.123 0.409 ± 0.060 60 18 & 19
Extended Lr vs. LX, D10 < 5. 3.624 ± 0.081 0.265 ± 0.096 0.343 ± 0.063 43 18 & 19
Compact Lr vs. LX, D10 > 5. 3.969 ± 0.094 0.324 ± 0.075 0.420 ± 0.064 60 18 & 19
Extended Lr vs. LX, D10 > 5. 3.981 ± 0.100 0.331 ± 0.069 0.377 ± 0.061 52 18 & 19

a On the Y-axis, Lr is in units of 1010L. On the X-axis: LX has been normalized by 1043 erg s−1, Lr by 35 × 1010L and σv by 400 km s−1. To account for the evolution of the scaling relations, we use LXEz−1, LrEz.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.