Table 6.
Evidence comparison for the 29 sources in the soft excess sample.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|
eROID | ln(Znth) – ln(ZBEST) | ln(Zrel) – ln(ZBEST) | Best model |
00001 | 0.0 | −0.69 | NTHCOMP |
00004 | 0.0 | −3.28 | NTHCOMP |
00007 | 0.0 | −1.26 | NTHCOMP |
00011 | 0.0 | −2.83 | NTHCOMP |
00029 | 0.0 | −0.60 | NTHCOMP |
00034 | 0.0 | −2.77 | NTHCOMP |
00035 | −0.25 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00038 | 0.0 | −0.85 | NTHCOMP |
00039 | 0.0 | −2.80 | NTHCOMP |
00045 | 0.0 | −2.30 | NTHCOMP |
00054 | 0.0 | −1.88 | NTHCOMP |
00057 | −0.16 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00076 | 0.0 | −0.32 | NTHCOMP |
00121 | 0.0 | −0.92 | NTHCOMP |
00122 | −0.15 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00153 | 0.0 | −0.98 | NTHCOMP |
00176 | −0.05 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00200 | 0.0 | −0.75 | NTHCOMP |
00204 | −0.39 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00216 | 0.0 | −2.01 | NTHCOMP |
00237 | 0.0 | −0.74 | NTHCOMP |
00288 | 0.0 | −1.15 | NTHCOMP |
00340 | 0.0 | −1.18 | NTHCOMP |
00358 | 0.0 | −1.36 | NTHCOMP |
00426 | 0.0 | −1.64 | NTHCOMP |
00760 | −0.26 | 0.0 | RELXILL |
00784 | 0.0 | −0.27 | NTHCOMP |
01136 | 0.0 | −0.44 | NTHCOMP |
01736 | 0.0 | −1.16 | NTHCOMP |
ALL | 0.0 | −30.93 | NTHCOMP |
Notes. The source ID is listed in column (1). Columns (2) and (3) show the Bayesian evidence, where the values are all normalised by subtracting the highest fit value. A negative number in the column therefore indicates the worse fitting model, while a value of zero shows the preferred model. In the final row, the same exercise is performed for the full sample. Column (4) lists the name of the best fitting model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.