Table B.1.
Comparison between αCO prescriptions.
| fmol vs. M* | ||||
| αCO | intercept | slope | σ [dex] | ρcorr |
| A17 | 0.13 ± 0.38 | −0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.36 | −0.19 |
| H20 | −1.09 ± 0.35 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.03 |
| MW | −1.99 ± 0.34 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.19 |
| τmol vs. M* | ||||
| αCO | intercept | slope | σ | ρcorr |
| A17 | 7.29 ± 0.32 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.33 |
| H20 | 5.90 ± 0.30 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.58 |
| MW | 4.91 ± 0.31 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.67 |
Notes. Values quoted are best-fit parameters and 1σ uncertainties from the Bayesian linear fit to the fmol vs. M* and τmol vs. M* relations assuming three different αCO prescriptions according to Accurso et al. (2017) (A17) and Hunt et al. (2020) (H20), and a constant value corresponding to the one measured in the Milky Way (MW). Also listed are the intrinsic scatter σ and the linear correlation coefficient ρcorr for the respective fits.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.