Table 5.
Best-fit orbital elements of the dusty sources.
ID | Source | a [mpc] | e | i [°] | ω [°] | Ω [°] | tclosest [yr] | PA [°] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | D2 | 30.01 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 57.86 ± 1.71 | 44.11 ± 1.14 | 221.16 ± 1.43 | 2002.16 ± 0.03 | 129.9 |
2 | D23 | 44.24 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 95.68 ± 1.14 | 93.39 ± 1.89 | 120.89 ± 3.15 | 2016.00 ± 0.03 | –84.2 |
3 | D3 | 35.20 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 50.99 ± 1.20 | 63.59 ± 2.29 | 206.26 ± 1.76 | 2002.23 ± 0.01 | 147.6 |
3/1 | D3.1 | 31.46 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 63.02 ± 1.04 | 231.47 ± 1.18 | 47.89 ± 0.96 | 2004.37 ± 0.008 | –137.5 |
4 | D5 | 2983.10 ± 2.11 | 0.991 ± 0.001 | 100.84 ± 4.58 | 343.20 ± 8.02 | 73.33 ± 3.89 | 2008.95 ± 3.43 | 103.1 |
5 | D9 | 44.00 ± 1.145 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 102.55 ± 1.14 | 127.19 ± 8.02 | 257.25 ± 1.71 | 2309.13 ± 7.01 | –45.9 |
6 | OS1 | 16.53 ± 0.50 | 0.758 ± 0.075 | 107.71 ± 20.68 | 93.96 ± 8.42 | 88.23 ± 16.50 | 2020.68 ± 0.02 | –86.6 |
7 | OS2 | 12.54 ± 0.19 | 0.633 ± 0.019 | 95.11 ± 4.98 | 138.65 ± 4.92 | 114.01 ± 2.17 | 2029.41 ± 0.05 | –122.8 |
8 | G1 | 48.58 ± 0.05 | 0.968 ± 0.009 | 108.28 ± 1.79 | 114.59 ± 4.69 | 99.69 ± 4.89 | 2001.08 ± 0.05 | –80.9 |
9 | G2/DSO | 17.23 ± 0.20 | 0.963 ± 0.004 | 120.32 ± 2.40 | 92.81 ± 1.60 | 63.02 ± 1.37 | 2014.43 ± 0.01 | –59.4 |
10 | X7 | 149.99 ± 0.36 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 74.82 ± 7.84 | 190.22 ± 17.47 | 25.15 ± 10.77 | 1975.85 ± 0.30 | 178.7 |
11 | X7.1 | 171.34 ± 5.27 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 89.38 ± 3.72 | 28.64 ± 17.18 | 60.90 ± 8.59 | 2040.99 ± 15.41 | 117.7 |
12 | X8 | 48.69 ± 1.12 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 95.11 ± 5.61 | 57.24 ± 5.90 | 40.10 ± 4.52 | 1992.92 ± 10.54 | –33.4 |
Notes. See Fig. 1 for the related ID of the dusty sources. The uncertainties are adapted from the MCMC simulations. The first column indicates the ID as provided in the inset in Fig. 1, where we mark the approximate position of the related dusty source (second column). As proposed in Peißker et al. (2020c), D3.1 is most likely a dust and gas filament, such as the Brγ-bar (see Schödel et al. 2011) with a weak radio/submillimeter counterpart (Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2017b).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.