Table 3.
Properties and inferred distances for four best-fitting seismic models.
| M⋆ | Teff | log g | log(L⋆/L⊙) | Distance | Modes used | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M⊙] | [K] | [cgs] | [pc] | ℓ | ||
| 0.741 | 140 000 | 5.59 | 4.25 | 1016 | 1 and 1, 2 | This work |
| 0.870 | 160 000 | 5.64 | 4.51 | 1158 | 1 and 1, 2 | This work |
| 0.565 | 163 000 | 6.62 | 3.37 | 302 | 1, 2 | This work |
| 0.565 | 150 000 | 6.29 | 3.55 | 419 | 1, 2 | This work |
| 0.74 | 150 000 | 5.7 | 4.27 | 970 | Spectroscopy | |
| 538 | Astrometry | |||||
Notes. The sixth column indicates which models fit well to the data when just considering ℓ = 1 modes or a mixture of ℓ = 1, 2 modes (see text for discussion of how these models were identified). Also shown are the corresponding values given by spectroscopy and astrometry, for quick comparison.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.