Open Access

Table 6.

Values for best-fit continuum models for the six observations analyzed to build the light curve.

Observation Component Parameter Value Units
Chandra – 2001 ZTBABS NH < 3.6 × 1021 cm−2
POWERLAW Photon index 1.8 ± 0.4
Normalization 1 . 75 0.6 + 0.9 × 10 4 $ 1.75^{+0.9}_{-0.6} \times 10^{-4} $ photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1

XMM – 2003 TBPCF NH 6 . 4 2.0 + 4.2 × 10 22 $ 6.4^{+4.2}_{-2.0} \times 10^{22} $ cm−2
Covering fraction 0 . 76 0.17 + 0.1 $ 0.76^{+0.1}_{-0.17} $
POWERLAW Photon index 2.03 ± 0.14
Normalization (1.4 ± 0.2)×10−4 photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1

eRASS1 TBPCF NH cm−2
Covering fraction 0.8
POWERLAW Photon index 1.94 ± 0.24
Normalization 1 . 6 1.1 + 2.8 × 10 4 $ 1.6^{+2.8}_{-1.1} \times 10^{-4} $ photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1-

eRASS2 TBPCF NH cm−2
Covering fraction 0.8
POWERLAW Photon index 1 . 94 0.25 + 0.23 $ 1.94^{+0.23}_{-0.25} $
Normalization < 1  × 10−4 photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1

eRASS3 TBPCF NH cm−2
Covering fraction 0.8
POWERLAW Photon index 2 . 00 0.25 + 0.23 $ 2.00^{+0.23}_{-0.25} $
Normalization 2 . 4 1.7 + 4.4 × 10 4 $ 2.4^{+4.4}_{-1.7} \times 10^{-4} $ photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1

eRASS4 TBPCF NH 3 . 1 3.0 + 14.6 × 10 21 $ 3.1^{+14.6}_{-3.0} \times 10^{21} $ cm−2
Covering fraction 0.8
POWERLAW Photon index 2 . 03 0.24 + 0.24 $ 2.03^{+0.24}_{-0.24} $
Normalization 3 . 4 1.3 + 3.4 × 10 4 $ 3.4^{+3.4}_{-1.3} \times 10^{-4} $ photon keV−1 cm−2 s−1

Notes. The empty column density entries reflect the fact that the fit could not constrain the parameter.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.