Table 2.
Uncertainties (εrel, 90%,σfit, 90% and Δ90%) found after fitting the SBF of the galaxy presented in Fig. 4 under different considerations.
| Fit: | 1 Param. | C.T. | σaz | 2 Param. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
This work.  |
 |
|||
| εrel, 90% [%] | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.49 | 1.96; 5.43 |
| σfit, 90% [%] | 0.51 | 0.51 | 8.22 | 0.76; 2.52 |
| Δ90% [%] | 5.76 | 5.76 | 4.87 | 8.57; 12.2 |
Notes. Column 1 (1 Param.): fitting of Eq. (21) considering the SBF is the only unknown parameter, i.e. as done in the rest of the work. Column 2 (C.T.): fitting of Eq. (A.7), i.e. the SBF is the only unknown parameter and we consider the crossed term (it returns the same results as Col. 1). Column 3 (σaz): weighted fitting of Eq. (21) considering the uncertainties when performing the azimuthal average of PS(Galmock fluc mask). Column 4 (2 Param.): fitting of Eq. (21) considering both the SBF and the power spectrum of the instrumental noise as unknown parameters (uncertainties of both are shown in order).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.