Table 3.
Bulk Lorentz factors Γ for each GRB that was co-detected by GBM and LAT and analyzed in this work, applying the compactness argument.
Name | Method | Γ | R [cm] | tvar [ms] |
---|---|---|---|---|
110721 |
![]() |
> 412.7 | > 3.41 × 1014 | 100 |
(assumed) | ||||
160625 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
![]() |
> 745.1 | > 6.22 × 1014 | 100 | |
080916 | Aft. onset (ISM) | 1410 ± 151 | > 3.73 × 1013 [Eq. (8)] | > 1.67 |
Aft. onset (Wind) | 660 ± 49 | > 1.10 × 1015 [Eq. (8)] | > 225 | |
170214 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
100724 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
140206 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
131108 |
![]() |
> 398.1 | > 2.80 × 1014 | 100 |
141028 |
![]() |
> 231.8 | > 0.97 × 1014 | 100 |
100116 |
![]() |
> 278.0 | > 1.54 × 1014 | 100 |
160821 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
130504 |
![]() |
> 136.2 | > 0.37 × 1014 | 100 |
110328 |
![]() |
> 201.8 | > 0.81 × 1014 | 100 |
160509 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
180720 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
151006 |
![]() |
> 229.5 | > 1.05 × 1014 | 100 |
160905 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
150902 |
![]() |
> 254.6 | > 1.30 × 1014 | 100 |
090328 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
100 |
100826 |
![]() |
> 282.0 | > 1.6 × 1014 | 100 |
![]() |
> 495.3 | > 3.84 × 1014 | 100 | |
110731 | Aft. onset (ISM) | 971.2 ± 12.1 | > 1.60 × 1013 [Eq. (8)] | > 1.08 |
Aft. onset (Wind) | 331.5 ± 8.3 | > 2.57 × 1015 [Eq. (8)] | > 1494 | |
160910 |
![]() |
> 289.6 | > 1.68 × 1014 | 100 |
150202 |
![]() |
> 171.4 | > 0.59 × 1014 | 100 |
Notes. Depending on the presence or absence of a cutoff in the high-energy spectrum, these values are measurements or lower–limits, respectively. For each GRB, the table list the name, the method applied to derive Γ, the corresponding value of bulk Lorentz factor Γ, the implied value of the distance R from the central engine and the variability timescale, which we assumed to be 100 ms for each GRB. For the only two GRB in our sample (GRB 080916C and GRB 110131) with also an independent estimate of Γ derived from the afterglow onset in Ghirlanda et al. 2018, we reported those Γ values for the ISM and wind–like cases and the implied lower–limits on the distance R when combined with the pair–production opacity argument (following Eq. (8)). In those two cases, we also report the different variability timescale implied by the corresponding values of R and Γ, following tvar = R(1 + z)/(2cΓ2).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.