Table 6.
Fit results for models where fb depends on mass only.
| αL | αH | A2 | B | C | D | F | fom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | −2.5 | 2.2 | 0.0041 | −0.60 | 0.0 | −0.75 | 4.5 |
| −0.5 | −2.5 | 2.8 | 0.0036 | −0.55 | 0.0 | −0.75 | 2.7 |
| −1 | −2.5 | 1.2 | 0.0058 | −0.60 | 0.0 | −0.75 | 2.8 |
| −0.5 | −3 | 0.92 | 0.0072 | −0.50 | 0.0 | −0.7 | 4.5 |
| −1 | −3 | 0.57 | 0.0086 | −0.50 | 0.0 | −0.7 | 3.1 |
Notes. Best-fitting parameters and corresponding figure of merit for the five better-fitting power spectrum models, with low- and high-frequency slopes given in the first two columns, when the bend frequency is allowed to depend only on mass and not on REdd (i.e., when parameter D is fixed to D = 0).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.