Table 1.
Overview of candidates.
| IDMW | IDMD | IDSkel | IDRaf | IDGuo | RA | Dec | zMW | zMD | zSkel | cMW | cMD | SN336 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold candidates | ||||||||||||
| 1181371 | 7193 | 24480 | 6470 | – | 53.1358 | −27.7955 | 3.084 | 3.085 | 3.441 | 2 | 2 | 5.01 |
| 3052076 | 1087 | 24193 | 3506 | 12448 ( * ) | 53.1679 | −27.798 | 3.457 | 3.462 | 1.711 | 3 | 3 | 4.07 |
| 109004028 | – | 15601 | – | 7570 | 53.0994 | −27.8392 | 3.267 | – | 1.492 | 2 | – | 3.03 |
| 122021111 | – | 16523 | – | 8005 | 53.1389 | −27.8354 | 3.794 | – | 0.724 | 3 | – | 3.57 |
| 126049137 | – | 20189 | – | 10131 | 53.2042 | −27.8172 | 4.426 | – | 1.222 | 2 | – | 4.39 |
| Silver candidates | ||||||||||||
| 1521589 | 7169 | 26130 | 4873 | 13707 | 53.1283 | −27.7887 | 3.152 | 3.155 | 1.537 | 3 | 2 | 2.69 |
| 3452147 | 2134 | 23769 | 3431 | 12256 | 53.1541 | −27.7988 | 3.521 | 3.524 | 4.099 | 3 | 2 | 2.6 |
| 4062373 | 1360 | 27696 | 37765 | 14691 | 53.1792 | −27.7829 | 3.663 | 3.666 | 1.014 | 3 | 2 | 2.21 |
| 4172404 | 7121 | 27408 | 6974 | 14469 | 53.1851 | −27.7839 | 3.672 | 3.675 | 3.759 | 3 | 2 | 2.88 |
| 5622786 | 7137 | (20161?) | (781?) | – | 53.1604 | −27.8174 | 4.005 | 4.007 | – | 3 | 2 | 2.05 |
| 119004004 | – | 16269 | – | 7896 | 53.1891 | −27.8363 | 3.314 | – | 0.798 | 3 | – | 2.59 |
| 122032127 | – | 16000 | – | 7760 | 53.1326 | −27.8374 | 4.348 | – | 0.892 | 2 | – | 2.33 |
Notes. IDMW: Identifier in the MUSE-Wide catalogue (Urrutia et al. 2019, and in prep.; Kerutt et al. 2022). The colours indicate if the object is placed in the gold or silver category, as explained in Sect. 3.3. IDMD: Identifier in the MUSE-Deep catalogue (Inami et al. 2017). IDSkel: identifier from the 3D-HST CANDELS catalogue in Skelton et al. (2014). IDRaf: identifier from the UDF catalogue in Rafelski et al. (2015). IDGuo: identifier from the CANDELS GOODS-S catalogue in Guo et al. (2013). RA, Dec: right ascension and declination (Kerutt et al. 2022). zMW: redshift from MUSE-Wide, based on the Lyα line, corrected to systemic using the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) or peak separation (if the line has a double peak), based on Verhamme et al. (2018). zMD: redshift from Inami et al. (2017). zSkel: redshift from Skelton et al. (2014). cMW: classification confidence (0 lowest and 3 highest) of the redshift of the LAE based on three different investigators and a consolidation (see Urrutia et al. 2019; Schmidt et al. 2021; Kerutt et al. 2022). cMD: confidence from Inami et al. (2017). SN336: signal-to-noise in the LyC band WFC3/UVIS F336W. The object marked with ( * ) is already found in Saxena et al. (2022) and further discussed in Rivera-Thorsen et al. (2022).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.