Table 1
Method comparison on the grid.
| Method | µ [10−3] | σµ [10−3] | c [10−4] | σc [10−4] | Simulated galaxies [106] | Relative runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No cancel | 12.85 | 2.96 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 1.0 |
| Shape | 10.64 | 0.86 | 7.8 | 0.5 | 6.4 | 2.0 |
| Both | 11.10 | 0.55 | 7.7 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 2.4 |
| RM 0.1 (resp.) | 8.74 | 0.78 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 10.6 | 3.3 |
| RM 0.1 (fit) | 11.34 | 0.69 | 8.1 | 1.2 | 10.6 | 3.3 |
| Both 0.02 | 6.53 | 1.40 | 7.0 | 0.2 | 38.4 | 7.5 |
| RM 0.02 | 6.84 | 0.85 | 7.4 | 0.7 | 6.4 | 2.0 |
Notes. We list the total number of simulated galaxies (including additional versions for the cancellations) for each method in the second last column. The relative runtime is always compared to the case without any cancellation. Only galaxies brighter than 24.5 magnitudes fulfilling the S/N larger than ten criterion are considered here. The RM in the first column denotes the response method. If the method is followed by a float number, this denotes the used shear interval. For the differentiation between response (resp.) and fit approach for RM 0.1 see Sect. 5.1.2.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.