Fig. 17.

Download original image
CC and NCC model recover comparison. Left panel: Comparison of the 3D temperature profiles of typical CC and NCC clusters in the THREE HUNDRED PROJECT sample recovered with the IAE and parametric models using twelve 2D annuli within R500 (points with error bars). The dashed line shows the true 3D temperature profiles. The solid lines and shaded regions show the reconstructed 3D temperature profiles with 1-σ dispersion obtained with the IAE model. The dotted lines are the 3D temperature profiles recovered with the Vikhlinin et al. (2006) parametric model. For better visibility, the 1-σ dispersion for the parametric model is not shown. Right panel: 3D temperature profile reconstruction with the IAE and parametric models for two complex cases in the THREE HUNDRED PROJECT. For better visibility, 2D profiles and the 1-σ dispersion are not shown. For both figures, the bottom panel shows a fractional difference between the true and recovered 3D profiles. For NCC and CC clusters, both the IAE model and parametric model reconstruction with optimal priors are comparable, but the former exhibits slightly better performance. For the complex cases, the IAE model is more accurate in uncovering the profile shapes.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.