Projection of the shape model of (1867) Deiphobus. The convex shape model (blue) with the pole (338°, 79°) does not agree well with the observed chords. The nonconvex ADAM model (orange) provides a much better fit with the pole direction (329°, 67°) and an equivalent diameter of 108 ± 4 km. The second chord from the left is not consistent with the two other chords next to it, probably due to some systematic error (or the shape is highly concave at this place). Due to the negative observation (miss chord on the right), the shape cannot be larger and its size is significantly smaller than the values derived from Akari (131 ± 2 km) and IRAS (123 ± 4 km) data.