Table 5.
Previous distance measurements for M 51 from the literature, along with the new estimates.
| μ [mag] | D [Mpc] | Method | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| This work | |||
| 29.40 ± 0.09 | 7.59 ± 0.30 | Fund. mode PL | Conroy et al. (2018) |
| 29.37 ± 0.09 | 7.49 ± 0.30 | Fund. + Overtone PL | Conroy et al. (2018) |
| 29.20 ± 0.20 | 6.92 ± 0.69 | SN 2005cs EPM flat t0 | 2005cs |
| 29.33 ± 0.11 | 7.34 ± 0.39 | SN 2005cs EPM LC t0 | 2005cs |
| μ [mag] | D [Mpc] | Reference | Data |
| Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) | |||
| 29.67 ± 0.09 | 8.58 ± 0.36 | McQuinn et al. (2017) | McQuinn et al. (2016) |
| 29.78 ± 0.13 | 9.05 ± 0.54 | Tikhonov et al. (2015) | archival HST |
| 29.79 ± 0.14 | 9.09 ± 0.59 | Tikhonov et al. (2015) | archival HST |
| 29.74 ± 0.14 | 8.88 ± 0.57 | Tikhonov et al. (2015) | archival HST |
| SN optical | |||
| 29.46 ± 0.12 | 7.80 ± 0.43 | Vogl et al. (2020) | 2005cs |
| 29.46 ± 0.11 | 7.80 ± 0.40 | Pejcha & Prieto (2015) | 2005cs |
| 29.77 ± 0.08 | 8.99 ± 0.33 | Rodríguez et al. (2014) | 2005cs |
| 29.63 ± 0.05 | 8.43 ± 0.19 | Rodríguez et al. (2014) | 2005cs |
| 29.51 ± 0.14 | 7.97 ± 0.51 | Bose & Kumar (2014) | 2005cs |
| 29.37 ± 0.04 | 7.49 ± 0.14 | Bose & Kumar (2014) | 2005cs |
| 28.96 ± 0.17 | 6.20 ± 0.48 | Bose & Kumar (2014) | 2005cs |
| 28.91 ± 0.05 | 6.06 ± 0.14 | Bose & Kumar (2014) | 2005cs |
| 29.62 ± 0.05 | 8.40 ± 0.19 | Vinkó et al. (2012) | 2005cs, 2011dh |
| 29.67 ± 0.05 | 8.60 ± 0.20 | Takáts & Vinkó (2012) | 2005cs |
| 29.38 ± 0.06 | 7.50 ± 0.21 | Takáts & Vinkó (2012) | 2005cs |
| 29.61 ± 0.21 | 8.35 ± 0.81 | Poznanski et al. (2009) | 2005cs |
| 29.75 ± 0.12 | 8.90 ± 0.49 | Dessart et al. (2008) | 2005cs |
| 29.75 ± 0.16 | 8.90 ± 0.66 | Dessart et al. (2008) | 2005cs |
| 29.50 ± 0.18 | 7.90 ± 0.66 | Baron et al. (2007) | 2005cs |
| 29.40 ± 0.29 | 7.59 ± 1.01 | Takáts & Vinkó (2006) | 2005cs |
| 29.02 ± 0.44 | 6.36 ± 1.29 | Takáts & Vinkó (2006) | 2005cs |
| 29.60 ± 0.30 | 8.32 ± 1.14 | Richmond et al. (1996) | 1994I |
| 28.90 ± 0.69 | 6.02 ± 1.91 | Baron et al. (1996) | 1994I |
| 29.20 ± 0.30 | 6.29 ± 0.96 | Iwamoto et al. (1994) | 1994I |
| Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function (PNLF) | |||
| 29.41 ± 0.12 | 7.62 ± 0.42 | Ciardullo et al. (2002) | Feldmeier et al. (1997) |
| 29.52 ± 0.12 | 8.02 ± 0.44 | Ferrarese et al. (2000) | Feldmeier et al. (1997) |
| 29.62 ± 0.15 | 8.40 ± 0.58 | Feldmeier et al. (1997) | Feldmeier et al. (1997) |
| Surface Brightness Fluctuations (SBF) | |||
| 29.32 ± 0.14 | 7.31 ± 0.47 | Tully et al. (2013) | Tonry et al. (2001) |
| 29.38 ± 0.27 | 7.52 ± 0.93 | Ciardullo et al. (2002) | Tonry et al. (2001) |
| 29.42 ± 0.27 | 7.66 ± 0.95 | Tonry et al. (2001) | Tonry et al. (2001) |
| 29.47 ± 0.28 | 7.83 ± 1.01 | Ferrarese et al. (2000) | Tonry et al. (2001) |
| 29.59 ± 0.15 | 8.28 ± 0.57 | Richmond et al. (1996) | Richmond et al. (1996) |
Notes. The list contains the data plotted in Fig. 15. The Data column shows the source of the data that were used for the analysis, except for supernovae, in which case, the individual objects are listed. For a more complete list of distances and a review of each method, we refer to Table 2 in McQuinn et al. (2016). Bold values: values derived in the present paper.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.