Press Release
Open Access

Table 2

Comparison of a constant line vs. a sine fit for the FWHM phase variations.

Epoch Mask Mean Mean error STD RMSconst RMSsine
(km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)
2019a default 19 0.29 0.40 0.40 1.8 0.39 2.0
geff > 1.2 23 0.46 1.16 1.16 6.9 1.13 8.0
2019b default 21 0.41 0.63 0.63 2.3 0.62 2.5
geff > 1.2 27 0.84 1.77 1.77 6.7 1.71 6.9
2020a default 21 0.41 0.68 0.68 3.2 0.61 3.4
geff > 1.2 27 0.82 2.47 2.47 12.2 2.29 13.3
2020b default 19 0.30 0.47 0.47 3.0 0.47 3.4
geff > 1.2 22 0.46 0.83 0.83 5.3 0.79 7.3

Notes. The columns are: 1) subset of the time series, 2) line list used in LSD computation, 3) mean value of FWHM, 4) mean error bar on FWHM, 5) dispersion of the data set, 6) RMS (Root Mean Square) residual of a constant line fit equal to the average of the data set, 7) reduced χ2 of the constant fit, 8) RMS residual of a sine fit at the stellar rotation period, 9) reduced χ2 of the sine fit.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.