Open Access

Table 7.

Masses of the bodies in γ Cep found in the literature.

Source Method MA Method MB Method MAb MAb sin iAb
MA (M) MB (M) MAb (MJup) (MJup)
Fuhrmann (2004) Spectroscopy 1.59
Hatzes et al. (2003) Fuhrmann (2004) 1.59 ± 0.12 Derived 1.7 ± 0.4
Torres (2007) Spec. & phot. 1.18 ± 0.11 Derived 0.362 ± 0.022 1.43 ± 0.13
Neuhäuser et al. (2007) Dynamical 1.40 ± 0.12 Dynamical 0.409 ± 0.018 1.60 ± 0.13
Mortier et al. (2013, Table 5) Spectroscopy 1.26 ± 0.14
Stello et al. (2017) Asteroseismology 1.32 ± 0.20
Baines et al. (2018) Interfero. (model) 1.41 ± 0.08
Malla et al. (2020) Asteroseismology 1.32 ± 0.12
This work Asteroseismology Derived Derived 1.41 ± 0.08

Notes. Here we only report on values explicitly reported in any of the given papers. The method denotes the approach used to derive the quantity, the masses of MB and MAb this are typically derived from the mass function, with the exception of dynamically determined masses. Hatzes et al. (2003) have used the mass estimate from Fuhrmann (2004), who states that typical errors for the mass are less than 10% for the stars in that study.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.