Table B.1.
Atomic data and abundances for individual lines analysed.
| Stellar ID | Species | λ | χ | log gf | EW | σEW | logϵ(X) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Å) | (eV) | (mÅ) | (mÅ) | (dex) | ||||
| 75044 | 11.0 | 5688.20 | 2.10 | −0.41 | 53.18 | 6.77 | 4.46 | 1 |
| 75044 | 11.0 | 5889.95 | 0.00 | +0.11 | 481.72 | 10.48 | 4.66 | 1 |
| 75044 | 11.0 | 5895.92 | 0.00 | −0.19 | 368.27 | 8.08 | 4.52 | 1 |
| 75044 | 12.0 | 5172.68 | 2.71 | −0.36 | 246.40 | 12.37 | 4.60 | 2 |
| 75044 | 12.0 | 5183.60 | 2.72 | −0.17 | 455.35 | 13.94 | 5.43 | 2 |
| 75044 | 19.0 | 7698.96 | 0.00 | −0.18 | synth | synth | 2.98 | 1 |
| 75044 | 20.0 | 6102.72 | 1.88 | −0.81 | synth | synth | 4.07 | 3 |
| 75044 | 20.0 | 6122.22 | 1.89 | −0.33 | synth | synth | 4.25 | 3 |
| 75044 | 20.0 | 6161.29 | 2.52 | −1.35 | synth | synth | 4.11 | 3 |
| 75044 | 21.1 | 4324.99 | 0.60 | −0.44 | synth | synth | 0.23 | 4 |
| 75044 | 21.1 | 4374.47 | 0.62 | −0.46 | synth | synth | 0.33 | 4 |
| 75044 | 21.1 | 4400.39 | 0.61 | −0.54 | synth | synth | 0.29 | 4 |
| 75044 | 22.0 | 4840.87 | 0.90 | −0.43 | 45.81 | 5.04 | 2.20 | 5 |
| 75044 | 22.0 | 5210.38 | 0.05 | −0.82 | synth | synth | 1.89 | 5 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 4443.80 | 1.08 | −0.71 | synth | synth | 2.44 | 6 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 4450.48 | 1.08 | −1.52 | synth | synth | 2.15 | 6 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 4501.27 | 1.12 | −0.77 | synth | synth | 2.89 | 6 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 4571.97 | 1.57 | −0.31 | synth | synth | 2.05 | 6 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 5226.54 | 1.57 | −1.26 | synth | synth | 2.61 | 7 |
| 75044 | 22.1 | 5336.79 | 1.58 | −1.60 | synth | synth | 2.76 | 6 |
Notes. The complete version of this table is available at the CDS. A subset is shown here to illustrate its form and content.
References. (1) Kramida et al. (2018); (2) Pehlivan Rhodin et al. (2017); (3) Yu & Derevianko (2018); (4) Lawler & Dakin (1989), using hfs from Kurucz & Bell (1995); (5) Lawler et al. (2013); (6) Wood et al. (2013); (7) Pickering et al. (2001), with corrections given in Pickering et al. (2002); (8) Sobeck et al. (2007); (9) Den Hartog et al. (2011) for both log(gf) value and hfs; (10) O’Brian et al. (1991); (11) Den Hartog et al. (2014); (12) Belmonte et al. (2017); (13) Ruffoni et al. (2014); (14) Den Hartog et al. (2019); (15) Meléndez & Barbuy (2009); (16) Lawler et al. (2015) for log(gf) values and HFS; (17) Wood et al. (2014); (18) Roederer et al. (2012); (19) Biémont et al. (2011); (20) Ljung et al. (2006); (21) Kramida et al. (2018), using HFS/IS from McWilliam (1998) when available; (22) Lawler et al. (2001a), using HFS from Ivans et al. (2006); (23) Lawler et al. (2009); (24) Li et al. (2007), using HFS from Sneden et al. (2009); (25) (Ivarsson et al. 2001), using HFS from Sneden et al. (2009); (26) Den Hartog et al. (2003), using HFS/IS from Roederer et al. (2008); (27) Lawler et al. (2006), using HFS/IS from Roederer et al. (2008); (28) Lawler et al. (2001b), using HFS/IS from Ivans et al. (2006); (29) Den Hartog et al. (2006); (30) Lawler et al. (2001c), using HFS from Lawler et al. (2001d); (31) Wickliffe et al. (2000); (32) Lawler et al. (2009) for log gf values and HFS; (33) Quinet et al. (2006).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.