Open Access

Table 4

Comparison of estimated vs. observed systematic uncertainties after the LIDAR correction Method II.

T9 km Bin Prediction uncertainty Observed bias for f Observed excess fluct. for f Reduced atm. excess fluct. for f Prediction uncertainty for a Observed bias for a Observed excess fluct. for a Reduced atm. excess fluct. for a
0.9 < T9 km < 1.0 1% (0 ± 2)% (6 ± 3)% (4 ± 5)% 0.004 −0.03 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.03 0.00 ± 0.04
0.82 < T9 km < 0.9 3% (−2 ± 2)% (8 ± 1)% (7 ± 2)% 0.01 −0.01 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.06
0.65 < T9 km < 0.82 7% (−5 ± 4)% (18 ± 4)% (18 ± 5)% 0.03 0.03 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.06 0.08 ± 0.08
0.5 < T9 km < 0.65 15% (−11 ± 4)% (16 ± 8)% (16 ± 9)% 0.05 0.02 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.11 0.05 ± 0.15

Notes. Predictions have been calculated from the total displayed in Table 3. Observed quantities refer to the average of the observations from three zenith-angle bins (e.g., displayed in Fig. 10). Reduced quantities have been obtained from “observed,” after quadratic subtraction of the excess uncertainty observed with the clear-nights reference spectrum: 4% for flux and 0.04 for spectral index a.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.