Open Access
Table 3.
Physics parameters corresponding to the best-fit models from this study.
| Parameters | Model 55 | Model 64 | Model 36 | Model 44 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remnant mass prescription | Fryer et al. (2012; delayed) | Patton & Sukhbold (2020) | Fryer et al. (2012; delayed) | Patton & Sukhbold (2020) |
| Natal kick normalization | BH mass normalized kicks | BH mass normalized kicks | No kick normalization | No kick normalization |
| Orbit circularization at RLO | Periastron | Conserved angular momentum | Conserved angular momentum | Conserved angular momentum |
| CE efficiency (αCE) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| CE core-envelope boundary | At XH = 0.30 | At XH = 0.30 | At XH = 0.30 | At XH = 0.30 |
| Observable wind-fed disk | Hirai & Mandel (2021) | Hirai & Mandel (2021) | No criterion | No criterion |
Notes. The best-fit models were selected based on two criteria, discussed in Sect. 4.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.