Open Access

Fig. 6

image

Download original image

Comparisons of period measurements from Gaia DR3, AAVSO, and ASAS-SN. Left panel: fundamental-mode Per values of RSGs from Chatys et al. (2019) versus the Gaia DR3 Per values. Right panel: Gaia DR3 Per values of 12 late-type stars from Messineo & Brown (2019) versus Per values from the ASAS-SN survey. Chatys et al. (2019) do not include errors. The ASAS II/366/catalog in Vizier does not contain errors. The Gaia DR3 LPV pipeline table includes only frequency and errors on the frequency. . Errors on the Per values should be directly determined as the widths of peaks in the periodogram (Kiss et al. 2006). The plotted error bars for the Gaia Per values are

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.