Open Access

Table 1.

Physical and dust properties of the Galactic post-AGB stars targeted in this study.

Source ID [Fe/H] Teff [K] L/L τ10 Td [K] Rin/R Flag
IRAS 01259+6823 19 −0.6 ± 0.1 5510 650 220–646 0.2 300 6.30 × 103 Q1
IRAS 08187–1905 20 −0.6 ± 0.1 5772 2600 2099–3286 0.23 130 1.55 × 105 Q2
SAO 239853 21 −0.8 ± 0.1 7452 20 500 13 080–48 520 0.28 140 3.80 × 105 Q2
HD 107369 22 −1.1 ± 0.1 7533 900 814–1010 < 10−4 150 Q1
HD 112374 23 −1.2 ± 0.1 6393 11 000 9961–11 882 ≤10−3 150 6.45 × 104 Q1
HD 133656 24 −0.7 ± 0.1 8238 5200 4861–5690 0.005 150 2.00 × 105 Q1
HR 6144 25 −0.4 ± 0.1 6728 25 500 22 212–30 419 < 10−4 120 Q1
HD 161796 26 −0.3 ± 0.1 6139 8000 5209–6322 0.3 130 2.85 × 105 Q1
IRAS 18025–3906 27 −0.5 ± 0.15 6154 17 000 975–12 963 0.7 150 3.60 × 105 Q2
HD 335675 28 −0.9 ± 0.2 6082 16 000 7303–28 359 0.9 390 3.95 × 104 Q2
IRAS 19386+0155 29 −1.1 ± 0.14 6303 9600 4345–22 765 0.7 1000 6.00 × 103 Q2
IRAS 19475+3119 30 −0.24 ± 0.15 8216 6500 5955–7545 0.09 120 4.15 × 105 Q1
HR 7671 31 −1.6 ± 0.1 6985 3600 3449–3734 < 10−4 30 Q1

J052740.75–702842.0 LMC −0.50 8283 5200 0.024 470 1.22 × 104
J045119.94–670604.8 LMC −0.40 8280 5000 0.006 270 2.97 × 104
J052241.52–675750.2 LMC −0.50 8284 5000 0.017 400 2.26 × 104
J050221.17–691317.2 LMC −0.60 5250 4500 0.022 180 5.45 × 104
J051906.86–694153.9 LMC −1.30 5613 3800 0.015 180 5.13 × 104

Notes. The quantities listed in the various columns are the following: 1: object name; 2: source ID (as reported in Kamath et al. 2022); 3 and 4: metallicity and effective temperatures, derived spectroscopically by Kamath et al. (2022); 5: luminosity derived in the present study for the Galactic sources; 6: luminosity from Kamath et al. (2022, see their Table 1), obtained in consideration of the upper and lower limits of the distances retrieved from Bailer-Jones et al. (2021); 7–9: optical depth at 10 μm, dust temperature and distance separating the central star from the inner border of the dusty region, found via SED fitting; 8: the quality flag (Q1 or Q2), based on the Gaia EDR3 renormalized unit weight error parameter, taken from Kamath et al. (2022). To ease the comparison with the results from Paper I, we report (in the 5 bottom lines) the non s-process enriched LMC sources studied in Paper I; for these sources, the metallicity and the effective temperature are from Kamath et al. (2015), while the luminosity and the dust properties are from Paper I.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.