Table 9.
Membership analysis for subclusters found with EDR3.
Maximum likelihood | Mahalanobis result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | KM | KM | NM | NM | Total |
Total | 0.1–10 Myr | Total | 0.1–10 Myr | Rejected | |
A | 418 | 388 | 234 | 166 | 15% |
B | 33 | 25 | 148 | 80 | 42% |
E | 14 | 11 | 92 | 80 | 14% |
F | 7 | 4 | 16 | 3 | 70% |
B/E | – | – | 7 | 5 | – |
Total | 472 | 428 | 497 | 334 |
Notes.Column 1: Subclusters obtained from the maximum likelihood considered in the Mahalanobis analysis. Columns 2 and 3: Total known members (KM) per cluster and those between the 0.1 Myr and 10 Myr isochrones. Columns 4 and 5: Total new members (NM) from the Mahalanobis analysis and those between the 0.1 Myr and 10 Myr isochrones. Column 6: Percentage of sources outwith the 0.1–10 Myr isochrones, including both the known and new members.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.