Table 3.
Summary of the results of the various fitting routines we completed.
TOD subtract | β1 | ℳ | r3 | fNE | fSW | TNE (keV) | TSW (keV) | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | 1.35 ± 0.05 | 0 | r1 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.09 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.54 |
Yes | 1.38 ± 0.05 | 0 | r2 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.60 |
No | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 0 | r1 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.94 |
No | 1.13 ± 0.03 | 0 | r2 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.06 |
![]() |
![]() |
9.00 |
Yes | 0.98 | 0 | r1 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.09 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.89 |
Yes | 0.98 | 0 | r2 | 0.54 ± 0.07 | 0.38 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.47 |
No | 0.98 | 0 | r1 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.44 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.42 |
No | 0.98 | 0 | r2 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.06 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.03 |
Yes | 0.98 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | r1 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 0.59 ± 0.08 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.22 |
Yes | 0.98 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | r2 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
9.15 |
No | 0.98 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | r1 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.98 |
No | 0.98 | 1.14 ± 0.04 | r2 | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.06 |
![]() |
![]() |
7.10 |
Notes. “TOD subtract” indicates whether the estimated elevation synchronous signal was subtracted from the data or not (see Sect. 4). β1 is the power law for the outer beta profile: if no uncertainty is given, then it was fixed in that model; if an uncertainty is given, then it was a free parameter. ℳ is the Mach number; if it is 0, then the shock was not included in that fit. The column r3 indicates whether the line-of-sight core radius was set to the semimajor (r1) or semiminor (r2) core radius. fNE and fSW are the suppression factors for the northeast and southwest bubbles, respectively. TNE and TSW are the implied temperatures in the bubbles assuming full pressure support; it is the temperature implied by f as shown in Fig. 2. For each model, an F-test was performed between that model and the same model without cavities. The significance of this test is reported in the last column.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.