Open Access

Fig. 4.

image

Download original image

Comparison of inferred galaxy intrinsic shape parameters for our modelled galaxies. The galaxy sample is divided into Fornax3D LTGs and ETGs (squares), SAMI passive galaxies (stars) and ATLAS3D ETGs (circles). Also added as diamonds are the massive lensed ETG ESO286-G022 by Poci & Smith (2022), FCC 47 by Fahrion et al. (2019) and Thater et al. (in prep.), PGC 046832 by den Brok et al. (2021), which is also discussed in Sect. 4, and the three simulated LTGs by Zhu et al. (2020), which are discussed in Sect. 5. Both the intrinsic intermediate-to-major axis ratio p (left panel) and minor-to-major axis ratio q (right panel) show no significant change for the majority of the galaxies. There is no clear trend of increasing discrepancy with galaxy morphology or triaxiality T ≡ (1 − p2)/(1 − q2). Uncertainties were calculated by including all models within of the best-fit model.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.