Fig. 3.

Download original image
Comparison of enclosed mass properties of our galaxy samples separated in total mass within one effective radius Mtot(< Re) (left panel) and stellar mass-to-light ratio M*/L (right panel) for correct (‘bugfix’) and incorrect (‘nofix’) orbit mirroring. The galaxy sample is a subset of Fornax3D LTGs and ETGs (green squares), SAMI passive galaxies (purple stars) and ATLAS3D ETGs (orange circles). Also added as black diamonds are the massive lensed ETG ESO286-G022 by Poci & Smith (2022), FCC 47 by Fahrion et al. (2019) and Thater et al. (in prep.), PGC 046832 by den Brok et al. (2021), which is also discussed in Sect. 4, and the three simulated LTGs by Zhu et al. (2020), which are discussed in Sect. 5. The dashed line shows the 1-1 line between the different versions. Both the derived total and stellar mass are not significantly affected by the incorrect mirroring of the orbits. Differences between the versions are within the reported statistical uncertainties of the dynamical modelling. Uncertainties were calculated by including all models within of the best-fit model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.