Open Access

Fig. 25.

image

Download original image

Comparison of the reconstructed pixelized PSFs by the LENSTRONOMY (first column) and the GLEE (second column) modelling procedures. Third column: illustrates the difference between the LENSTRONOMY and GLEE PSFs. The three rows correspond to the F160W, F814W, and F475X filters from top to bottom. The F160W PSF is supersampled with a supersampling factor of 3. We note that the illustrated supersampled LENSTRONOMY PSF was not used in the pre-un-blinding models and was reconstructed after the un-blinding to perform further tests. The original reconstructed PSF in LENSTRONOMY in F160W was not supersampled. The GLEE PSF FWHMs are smaller by ∼2−7% than the LENSTRONOMY ones.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.