Open Access
Table 3.
Reference samples from the literature.
| Comparison | Redshift | log(Mass) | SFR | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (M⊙) | (M⊙ yr−1) | |||
| This sample | 0.012 < z < 0.06 | 9.1–10.55 | 0.3–3.2 | – |
| LARS | 0.03 < z < 0.2 | 9.24–10.97 | 0.6–20.6 | Herenz et al. (2016), Guaita et al. (2015), Hayes et al. (2014) |
| DYNAMO | z ∼ 0.1 | 9–11 | 0.2–160 | Green et al. (2014) |
| LBA | z ∼ 0.2 | 9.1–10.9 | 2.5–108 | Gonçalves et al. (2010) |
| MASSIV | 0.9 < z < 1.6 | 9.7–11.2 | 6–300 | Epinat et al. (2012), Contini et al. (2012) |
| High-z SFR | 2 < z < 3 | 9–11.2 | 6–190 | Law et al. (2009) |
| SINS | 1.3 < z < 2.6 | 9.3–11.0 | 5–210 | Förster-Schreiber et al. (2009) |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.