Table 2.
BAO fitting results for the ACF using 1500 FLASK mocks.
Tests | z-bins | ⟨α⟩ | ⟨σα⟩ | σ68 | σstd | ⟨χ2⟩ /d.o.f. (![]() |
Ns (%) | Nd (%) | Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21 cm only | |||||||||
1–10 | 1.1158 | 0.1427 | 0.1209 | 0.1166 | 122.49/123 (1.00) | 65.27 | 45.73 | 1.0067 ± 0.2433 | |
Fid. config. | 11–20 | 1.0426 | 0.0977 | 0.0775 | 0.0923 | 76.84/70 (1.10) | 81.00 | 75.00 | 1.0082 ± 0.1014 |
21–30 | 1.0060 | 0.0565 | 0.0425 | 0.0514 | 69.54/61 (1.14) | 92.60 | 92.00 | 1.0076 ± 0.0507 | |
+ white noise | |||||||||
1–10 | 1.0906 | 0.1619 | 0.1042 | 0.1066 | 122.05/123 (0.99) | 58.73 | 48.60 | 1.0070 ± 0.2915 | |
Fid. config. | 11–20 | 1.0524 | 0.1213 | 0.0924 | 0.0948 | 76.34/70 (1.09) | 80.53 | 73.80 | 1.0107 ± 0.1470 |
21–30 | 1.0267 | 0.0932 | 0.0807 | 0.0883 | 67.88/61 (1.11) | 89.60 | 85.13 | 1.0070 ± 0.0989 | |
+ white noise + foreground residuals | |||||||||
Fid. config. | 1–10 | 1.0897 | 0.1624 | 0.1123 | 0.1118 | 122.42/123 (1.00) | 57.07 | 46.27 | 0.9952 ± 0.3270 |
(Δθ = 0.50°; | 11–20 | 1.0362 | 0.1267 | 0.0969 | 0.1070 | 76.60/70 (1.09) | 70.20 | 63.93 | 0.9989 ± 0.1546 |
q = 0, 1, 2) | 21–30 | 1.0074 | 0.1006 | 0.0809 | 0.0930 | 68.37/61 (1.12) | 78.00 | 73.53 | 0.9965 ± 0.1039 |
1–10 | 1.0901 | 0.1649 | 0.1018 | 0.1080 | 238.66/287 (0.83) | 53.40 | 44.67 | 0.9670 ± 0.6540 | |
Δθ = 0.25° | 11–20 | 1.0370 | 0.1307 | 0.0999 | 0.1054 | 166.28/180 (0.92) | 71.67 | 64.87 | 1.0135 ± 0.2560 |
21–30 | 1.0063 | 0.1034 | 0.0842 | 0.0970 | 154.15/164 (0.94) | 76.67 | 72.33 | 0.9826 ± 0.1394 | |
1–10 | 1.0888 | 0.1647 | 0.1100 | 0.1157 | 155.02/165 (0.94) | 57.73 | 46.60 | 1.0034 ± 0.3245 | |
Δθ = 0.40° | 11–20 | 1.0375 | 0.1298 | 0.0969 | 0.1054 | 100.85/98 (1.03) | 72.00 | 65.20 | 0.9981 ± 0.1597 |
21–30 | 1.0160 | 0.0998 | 0.0833 | 0.0982 | 90.00/86 (1.05) | 78.80 | 73.07 | 0.9976 ± 0.1065 | |
1–10 | 1.1687 | 0.1299 | 0.1092 | 0.1117 | 130.45/133 (0.98) | 37.40 | 18.73 | 0.9894 ± 0.3321 | |
q = 0, 1 | 11–20 | 1.0364 | 0.1294 | 0.1022 | 0.1070 | 85.43/80 (1.07) | 70.00 | 63.60 | 0.9955 ± 0.1521 |
21–30 | 1.0068 | 0.1005 | 0.0823 | 0.0951 | 78.36/71 (1.10) | 85.80 | 80.67 | 1.0023 ± 0.0989 | |
1–10 | 1.0790 | 0.1813 | 0.1432 | 0.1269 | 114.55/113 (1.01) | 34.93 | 26.47 | 1.0015 ± 0.3270 | |
q = −1, 0, 1, 2 | 11–20 | 1.0344 | 0.1307 | 0.0963 | 0.1018 | 67.38/60 (1.12) | 70.53 | 65.20 | 1.0047 ± 0.1521 |
21–30 | 1.0200 | 0.0954 | 0.0801 | 0.0895 | 58.92/51 (1.14) | 85.87 | 82.20 | 1.0096 ± 0.1014 | |
1–10 | 1.0995 | 0.1657 | 0.1046 | 0.1039 | 216.71/123 (1.76) | 14.20 | 11.33 | 0.9952 ± 0.7275 | |
q = −2, 0, 1 | 11–20 | 1.0444 | 0.1214 | 0.0839 | 0.0904 | 146.87/70 (2.10) | 39.87 | 37.73 | 0.9989 ± 0.1648 |
21–30 | 1.0178 | 0.0963 | 0.0790 | 0.0891 | 101.07/61 (1.67) | 63.87 | 61.07 | 0.9965 ± 0.1065 | |
+ white noise + foreground residual (varying beam size) | |||||||||
1–10 | 1.0929 | 0.1620 | 0.1162 | 0.1157 | 121.86/123 (0.99) | 58.20 | 46.33 | 0.9994 ± 0.3118 | |
Fid. config. | 11–20 | 1.0419 | 0.1245 | 0.1003 | 0.1113 | 77.35/70 (1.10) | 72.87 | 64.27 | 1.0004 ± 0.1546 |
21–30 | 1.0164 | 0.0900 | 0.0665 | 0.0871 | 72.09/61 (1.18) | 80.53 | 76.27 | 1.0030 ± 0.0887 |
Notes. The first three parts of the table correspond to analyses of 21 cm only, noisy 21 cm (+ white noise), and BINGO-like (+ white noise + foreground residuals) mocks, using the fiducial configuration in both cases. The other parts of the table show results from the robustness tests, where the first column points out the aspects that varied with respect to the fiducial configuration, namely the Δθ binning width and the q index from ω(θ) template. All robustness tests were performed over the BINGO-like mocks. The last part of the table corresponds to analyses of the BINGO-like mocks, employing the fiducial configuration, when the beam size was varied with frequency. The last column shows obtained from fitting the mean clustering from the mocks. See text for details.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.