Open Access

Table 2.

BAO fitting results for the ACF using 1500 FLASK mocks.

Tests z-bins α σα σ68 σstd χ2⟩ /d.o.f. () Ns (%) Nd (%) Mean
21 cm only

1–10 1.1158 0.1427 0.1209 0.1166 122.49/123 (1.00) 65.27 45.73 1.0067 ± 0.2433
Fid. config. 11–20 1.0426 0.0977 0.0775 0.0923 76.84/70 (1.10) 81.00 75.00 1.0082 ± 0.1014
21–30 1.0060 0.0565 0.0425 0.0514 69.54/61 (1.14) 92.60 92.00 1.0076 ± 0.0507

+ white noise

1–10 1.0906 0.1619 0.1042 0.1066 122.05/123 (0.99) 58.73 48.60 1.0070 ± 0.2915
Fid. config. 11–20 1.0524 0.1213 0.0924 0.0948 76.34/70 (1.09) 80.53 73.80 1.0107 ± 0.1470
21–30 1.0267 0.0932 0.0807 0.0883 67.88/61 (1.11) 89.60 85.13 1.0070 ± 0.0989

+ white noise + foreground residuals

Fid. config. 1–10 1.0897 0.1624 0.1123 0.1118 122.42/123 (1.00) 57.07 46.27 0.9952 ± 0.3270
θ = 0.50°; 11–20 1.0362 0.1267 0.0969 0.1070 76.60/70 (1.09) 70.20 63.93 0.9989 ± 0.1546
q = 0, 1, 2) 21–30 1.0074 0.1006 0.0809 0.0930 68.37/61 (1.12) 78.00 73.53 0.9965 ± 0.1039

1–10 1.0901 0.1649 0.1018 0.1080 238.66/287 (0.83) 53.40 44.67 0.9670 ± 0.6540
Δθ = 0.25° 11–20 1.0370 0.1307 0.0999 0.1054 166.28/180 (0.92) 71.67 64.87 1.0135 ± 0.2560
21–30 1.0063 0.1034 0.0842 0.0970 154.15/164 (0.94) 76.67 72.33 0.9826 ± 0.1394

1–10 1.0888 0.1647 0.1100 0.1157 155.02/165 (0.94) 57.73 46.60 1.0034 ± 0.3245
Δθ = 0.40° 11–20 1.0375 0.1298 0.0969 0.1054 100.85/98 (1.03) 72.00 65.20 0.9981 ± 0.1597
21–30 1.0160 0.0998 0.0833 0.0982 90.00/86 (1.05) 78.80 73.07 0.9976 ± 0.1065

1–10 1.1687 0.1299 0.1092 0.1117 130.45/133 (0.98) 37.40 18.73 0.9894 ± 0.3321
q = 0, 1 11–20 1.0364 0.1294 0.1022 0.1070 85.43/80 (1.07) 70.00 63.60 0.9955 ± 0.1521
21–30 1.0068 0.1005 0.0823 0.0951 78.36/71 (1.10) 85.80 80.67 1.0023 ± 0.0989

1–10 1.0790 0.1813 0.1432 0.1269 114.55/113 (1.01) 34.93 26.47 1.0015 ± 0.3270
q = −1, 0, 1, 2 11–20 1.0344 0.1307 0.0963 0.1018 67.38/60 (1.12) 70.53 65.20 1.0047 ± 0.1521
21–30 1.0200 0.0954 0.0801 0.0895 58.92/51 (1.14) 85.87 82.20 1.0096 ± 0.1014

1–10 1.0995 0.1657 0.1046 0.1039 216.71/123 (1.76) 14.20 11.33 0.9952 ± 0.7275
q = −2, 0, 1 11–20 1.0444 0.1214 0.0839 0.0904 146.87/70 (2.10) 39.87 37.73 0.9989 ± 0.1648
21–30 1.0178 0.0963 0.0790 0.0891 101.07/61 (1.67) 63.87 61.07 0.9965 ± 0.1065

+ white noise + foreground residual (varying beam size)

1–10 1.0929 0.1620 0.1162 0.1157 121.86/123 (0.99) 58.20 46.33 0.9994 ± 0.3118
Fid. config. 11–20 1.0419 0.1245 0.1003 0.1113 77.35/70 (1.10) 72.87 64.27 1.0004 ± 0.1546
21–30 1.0164 0.0900 0.0665 0.0871 72.09/61 (1.18) 80.53 76.27 1.0030 ± 0.0887

Notes. The first three parts of the table correspond to analyses of 21 cm only, noisy 21 cm (+ white noise), and BINGO-like (+ white noise + foreground residuals) mocks, using the fiducial configuration in both cases. The other parts of the table show results from the robustness tests, where the first column points out the aspects that varied with respect to the fiducial configuration, namely the Δθ binning width and the q index from ω(θ) template. All robustness tests were performed over the BINGO-like mocks. The last part of the table corresponds to analyses of the BINGO-like mocks, employing the fiducial configuration, when the beam size was varied with frequency. The last column shows obtained from fitting the mean clustering from the mocks. See text for details.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.